Our analysis showed that the rhetoric used in the public debate gave a simplified picture of a complex matter and that the argumentation used on both sides was based on the persons ethos rather than empirical evidence. We found that both categorisation and stigmatisation were occurring in the public debate which could be regarded as a barrier for integration.
|Educations||Basic - Bachelor Study Programme in Humanities, (Bachelor Programme) Basic|
|Publication date||18 Dec 2018|
|Number of pages||73|