Abstract
In this chapter I examine two possible reasons, which are prominent but
often not systematically discussed in the literature, for thinking even purely
symbolic establishment problematic. These are considerations of alienation
and symbolic equality. I am only concerned with ways in which establishment
might be normatively problematic even if it does not infringe on religious
freedom and does not involve material injustices in other respects.
often not systematically discussed in the literature, for thinking even purely
symbolic establishment problematic. These are considerations of alienation
and symbolic equality. I am only concerned with ways in which establishment
might be normatively problematic even if it does not infringe on religious
freedom and does not involve material injustices in other respects.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy |
| Editors | Cécile Laborde, Aurélia Bardon |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Place of Publication | Oxford |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Publication date | Jun 2017 |
| Pages | 118-131 |
| Chapter | 8 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780198794394 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2017 |
Keywords
- religion
- religion og politik
- stat og kirke
- Sekularisme
- religionsfrihed