What crisis of representation?: Challenging the neo-realism of poststructuralist policy research in Education

Eva Bendix Petersen

doi:10.1080/17508487.2015.983940

What crisis of representation? Challenging the neo-realism of poststructuralist policy research in Education

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

Offered through a split-text, this article mounts/destabilises the argument that policy research that cites authors usually associated with post-structural thought and which is published in a mainstream education policy journal is overwhelmingly realist in its ontologising practices. It reminds the reader why that is problematic and calls for a stronger post-realist praxis.

Original language	English
Journal	Critical Studies in Education
Volume	56
Issue number	1
Pages (from-to)	147-160
ISSN	1750-8487
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.983940
Publication status	Published - 2015

Link to document

10.1080/17508487.2015.983940

Cite this

@article{92b678a0479d4b259aed984d1b91d34d,

title = "What crisis of representation?: Challenging the neo-realism of poststructuralist policy research in Education",

abstract = "Offered through a split-text, this article mounts/destabilises the argument that policy research that cites authors usually associated with post-structural thought and which is published in a mainstream education policy journal is overwhelmingly realist in its ontologising practices. It reminds the reader why that is problematic and calls for a stronger post-realist praxis.",

author = "Petersen, {Eva Bendix}",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1080/17508487.2015.983940",

language = "English",

volume = "56",

pages = "147--160",

journal = "Critical Studies in Education",

issn = "1750-8487",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What crisis of representation?

T2 - Challenging the neo-realism of poststructuralist policy research in Education

AU - Petersen, Eva Bendix

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Offered through a split-text, this article mounts/destabilises the argument that policy research that cites authors usually associated with post-structural thought and which is published in a mainstream education policy journal is overwhelmingly realist in its ontologising practices. It reminds the reader why that is problematic and calls for a stronger post-realist praxis.

AB - Offered through a split-text, this article mounts/destabilises the argument that policy research that cites authors usually associated with post-structural thought and which is published in a mainstream education policy journal is overwhelmingly realist in its ontologising practices. It reminds the reader why that is problematic and calls for a stronger post-realist praxis.

U2 - 10.1080/17508487.2015.983940

DO - 10.1080/17508487.2015.983940

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1750-8487

VL - 56

SP - 147

EP - 160

JO - Critical Studies in Education

JF - Critical Studies in Education

IS - 1

ER -