Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding participation in European cohort studies of preterm children: the views of parents, healthcare professionals and researchers

  • RECAP Preterm-WP6 QS Work Group
  • , Sandra C.S. Marques
  • , Julia Doetsch
  • , Georgia Abate
  • , Anne Brødsgaard
  • , Grazia Colombo
  • , Marina Cuttini
  • , Pernille Pedersen
  • , Henrique Barros

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Retention of participants in cohort studies is a major challenge. A better understanding of all elements involved in participation and attrition phenomena in particular settings is needed to develop effective retention strategies. The study aimed to achieve an in-depth understanding of participant retention in longitudinal cohorts focusing on participants’ and researcher’s perspectives, across three diverse socio-geographic and cultural settings. Methods: This study used a triangulation of multi-situated methods to collect data on cohort studies of children born with less than 32 weeks of gestation in Denmark, Italy and Portugal. It included focus groups and individual semi-driven interviewing with involved key actors (i.e. parents, staff, healthcare professionals, researchers) and a collaborative visual methodology. A purposive sample of 48 key actors (n = 13 in Denmark; n = 13 in Italy; n = 22 in Portugal) was collected. A triangulation of phenomenological thematic analysis with discourse analysis was applied. Cross-contextual and context-specific situational elements involved in participation and attrition phenomena in these child cohorts were identified at various levels and stages. Results: Main findings included: situational challenges affecting potential and range of possibilities for implementation strategies (geopolitical environment, societal changes, research funding models); situational elements related to particular strategies acting as deterrents (postal questionnaires) and facilitators (multiple flexible strategies, reminders, regular interaction); main motivations to enrol and participate (altruism/solidarity and gratitude/sense of duty to reciprocate); main motivational deterrents to participate to follow-up waves (lack of bonding, insufficient feedback); entanglement of clinical and research follow-up as facilitator and deterrent. Conclusions: The multi-situated approach used, addressing the interplay of the lived experience of individuals, was of most value to understand participation variability under different implemented strategies in-context. Cross-contextual and context-specific situational elements that have been influential factors towards participation and attrition in the cohorts were identified.

Original languageEnglish
Article number19
JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume21
Issue number1
Number of pages14
ISSN1471-2288
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021
Externally publishedYes

Citation Styles