Transitional Justice in the North Atlantic: The Greenland Reconciliation Commission and the Role of Political Authority

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter analyses the politics of accountability, recognition, and disruption in relations between Greenland and Denmark, marked by centuries of colonization, modernization, and inequality. In 2013, the Greenland government initiated the establishment of a truth-telling mechanism, the Greenland Reconciliation Commission, aiming to reconcile Greenlanders with their past and with Denmark. The Danish government, meanwhile, plainly rejected participation in the Commission, which therefore became a unilateral project seeking recognition and – to some extent – post-colonial disruption. In the absence of Danish involvement, the Commission’s work turned towards intra-Greenlandic relations, outlining the contours of a disruptive potential that may shape the island’s future independence. To make sense of these developments, Gissel analyses three narratives about colonization and modernization in Greenland which inform the approach to transitional justice. The case illuminates the state-centric nature of standardised truth-telling and the extent to which it is shaped by political authority.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTransitional Justice in Aparadigmatic Contexts : Accountability, Recognition and Disruption
EditorsTine Destrooper, Line Engbo Gissel, Kerstin Bree Carlson
Number of pages20
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Publication date23 Mar 2023
Edition1
Pages106-125
Chapter6
ISBN (Print)9781032266176 (hbk), 9781032266152 (pbk)
ISBN (Electronic)9781003289104
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Mar 2023
SeriesTransitional Justice

Keywords

  • Transitional Justice
  • Greenland
  • Reconciliation
  • Greenland Reconciliation Commission
  • Official Apologies

Cite this