The exercise of power through multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainable agriculture and its inclusion and exclusion outcomes

Introduction to the symposium.

Emmanuelle Cheyns, Lone Riisgaard

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

A number of multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) and commodity roundtables have been created since the 1990s to respond to the growing criticism of agriculture’s environmental and social impacts. Driven by private and global-scale actors, these initiatives are setting global standards for sustainable agricultural practices. They claim to follow the new standard-making virtues of inclusiveness and consensus and base their legitimacy on their claim of balanced representation of, and participation by, all categories of stakeholders. This principle of representing a wide range of interests with a balance of power is at the heart of a new type of action that forms part of a broader political liberal model for building coalitions of interest groups. The intention of this symposium is to assess the nature of processes and outcomes of this model and in particular the forms of inclusion and exclusion they generate. In this introduction, we highlight differences in theoretical approaches to analyzing MSIs and to the manifestation of power through them. We distinguish between more traditional political-economy approaches and approaches concerned with ideational and normative power such as convention theory. We discuss some of the main paradoxes of MSIs related to their willingness to be 'inclusive' and at the same time their exclusionary or 'closure' effects, due to interactions with existing political economic contexts and embedded power inequalities and due to more subtle manifestations of power linked to the favouring of some forms of knowledge and participation over others.
Original languageEnglish
Article number31(3)
JournalAgriculture and Human Values
Volume31
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)409-423
ISSN0889-048X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Multi-stakeholder initiatives
  • private standards
  • power
  • sustainable agriculture
  • exclusion

Cite this

@article{cc1f1bedc79a4f1b8b648e734ef52650,
title = "The exercise of power through multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainable agriculture and its inclusion and exclusion outcomes: Introduction to the symposium.",
abstract = "A number of multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) and commodity roundtables have been created since the 1990s to respond to the growing criticism of agriculture’s environmental and social impacts. Driven by private and global-scale actors, these initiatives are setting global standards for sustainable agricultural practices. They claim to follow the new standard-making virtues of inclusiveness and consensus and base their legitimacy on their claim of balanced representation of, and participation by, all categories of stakeholders. This principle of representing a wide range of interests with a balance of power is at the heart of a new type of action that forms part of a broader political liberal model for building coalitions of interest groups. The intention of this symposium is to assess the nature of processes and outcomes of this model and in particular the forms of inclusion and exclusion they generate. In this introduction, we highlight differences in theoretical approaches to analyzing MSIs and to the manifestation of power through them. We distinguish between more traditional political-economy approaches and approaches concerned with ideational and normative power such as convention theory. We discuss some of the main paradoxes of MSIs related to their willingness to be 'inclusive' and at the same time their exclusionary or 'closure' effects, due to interactions with existing political economic contexts and embedded power inequalities and due to more subtle manifestations of power linked to the favouring of some forms of knowledge and participation over others.",
keywords = "Multi-stakeholder initiatives , private standards, power, sustainable agriculture , exclusion , Multi-stakeholder initiatives , private standards, power, sustainable agriculture , exclusion",
author = "Emmanuelle Cheyns and Lone Riisgaard",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s10460-014-9508-4",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "409--423",
journal = "Agriculture and Human Values",
issn = "0889-048X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

The exercise of power through multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainable agriculture and its inclusion and exclusion outcomes : Introduction to the symposium. / Cheyns, Emmanuelle; Riisgaard, Lone.

In: Agriculture and Human Values, Vol. 31, No. 3, 31(3), 2014, p. 409-423.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The exercise of power through multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainable agriculture and its inclusion and exclusion outcomes

T2 - Introduction to the symposium.

AU - Cheyns, Emmanuelle

AU - Riisgaard, Lone

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - A number of multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) and commodity roundtables have been created since the 1990s to respond to the growing criticism of agriculture’s environmental and social impacts. Driven by private and global-scale actors, these initiatives are setting global standards for sustainable agricultural practices. They claim to follow the new standard-making virtues of inclusiveness and consensus and base their legitimacy on their claim of balanced representation of, and participation by, all categories of stakeholders. This principle of representing a wide range of interests with a balance of power is at the heart of a new type of action that forms part of a broader political liberal model for building coalitions of interest groups. The intention of this symposium is to assess the nature of processes and outcomes of this model and in particular the forms of inclusion and exclusion they generate. In this introduction, we highlight differences in theoretical approaches to analyzing MSIs and to the manifestation of power through them. We distinguish between more traditional political-economy approaches and approaches concerned with ideational and normative power such as convention theory. We discuss some of the main paradoxes of MSIs related to their willingness to be 'inclusive' and at the same time their exclusionary or 'closure' effects, due to interactions with existing political economic contexts and embedded power inequalities and due to more subtle manifestations of power linked to the favouring of some forms of knowledge and participation over others.

AB - A number of multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) and commodity roundtables have been created since the 1990s to respond to the growing criticism of agriculture’s environmental and social impacts. Driven by private and global-scale actors, these initiatives are setting global standards for sustainable agricultural practices. They claim to follow the new standard-making virtues of inclusiveness and consensus and base their legitimacy on their claim of balanced representation of, and participation by, all categories of stakeholders. This principle of representing a wide range of interests with a balance of power is at the heart of a new type of action that forms part of a broader political liberal model for building coalitions of interest groups. The intention of this symposium is to assess the nature of processes and outcomes of this model and in particular the forms of inclusion and exclusion they generate. In this introduction, we highlight differences in theoretical approaches to analyzing MSIs and to the manifestation of power through them. We distinguish between more traditional political-economy approaches and approaches concerned with ideational and normative power such as convention theory. We discuss some of the main paradoxes of MSIs related to their willingness to be 'inclusive' and at the same time their exclusionary or 'closure' effects, due to interactions with existing political economic contexts and embedded power inequalities and due to more subtle manifestations of power linked to the favouring of some forms of knowledge and participation over others.

KW - Multi-stakeholder initiatives

KW - private standards

KW - power

KW - sustainable agriculture

KW - exclusion

KW - Multi-stakeholder initiatives

KW - private standards

KW - power

KW - sustainable agriculture

KW - exclusion

U2 - 10.1007/s10460-014-9508-4

DO - 10.1007/s10460-014-9508-4

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 409

EP - 423

JO - Agriculture and Human Values

JF - Agriculture and Human Values

SN - 0889-048X

IS - 3

M1 - 31(3)

ER -