The Alternative to Occupy: Radical Politics Between Protest and Parliament

Emil Husted, Allan Dreyer Hansen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


In this paper, we compare the political anatomy of two distinct enactments of (leftist) radical politics: Occupy Wall Street and The Alternative, a recently elected political party in Denmark. Departing from Ernesto Laclau’s conceptualization of ‘the universal’ and ‘the particular’, we show how the institutionalization of radical politics (as carried out by The Alternative) entails a move from universality towards particularity. This move, however, comes with the risk of cutting-off supporters who no longer feel represented by the project. We refer to this problem as ‘the problem of particularization’. In conclusion, we use the analysis to propose a conceptual distinction between radical movements and radical parties: While the former is constituted by an infinite chain of equivalent grievances, the latter is constituted by a prioritized set of differential demands. While both are important, we argue, they must remain distinct in order to preserve the universal spirit of contemporary radical politics
Translated title of the contributionAlternativet og Occupy: Radikal politik mellem protest og parlament
Original languageEnglish
JournaltripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)459–77
Number of pages19
Publication statusPublished - 2017


  • Radical Politics
  • Radical Movements
  • Radical Parties
  • Discourse Theory
  • Laclau
  • Universalism
  • Particularism

Cite this