Scrum Code Camps

Jan Pries-Heje; Lene Pries-Heje; Bente Dahlgaard

doi:10.1109/AGILE.2013.29

Scrum Code Camps

Jan Pries-Heje, Lene Pries-Heje, Bente Dahlgaard

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

Abstract

A classic way to choose a supplier is through a bidding process where tenders from competing companies are evaluated in relation to the customer’s requirements. If the customer wants to hire an agile software developing team instead of buying a software product, a new approach for comparing tenders is required. In this paper we present the design of such a new approach, the Scrum Code Camp, which can be used to assess agile team capability in a transparent and consistent way. A design science research approach is used to analyze properties of two instances of the Scrum Code Camp where seven agile teams were evaluated.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Agile Conference (AGILE) 2013
Number of pages	10
Volume	2013
Publisher	IEEE
Publication date	2013
Pages	64-73
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/AGILE.2013.29
Publication status	Published - 2013
Event	AGILE 2013 - Nashville, United States Duration: 5 Aug 2013 → 9 Aug 2013 http://agile2013.agilealliance.org/

Conference

Conference	AGILE 2013
Country/Territory	United States
City	Nashville
Period	05/08/2013 → 09/08/2013
Internet address	http://agile2013.agilealliance.org/

Series	Agile Conference 2013

Link to document

10.1109/AGILE.2013.29

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6612880&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D6612880

Cite this

@inproceedings{bebb4cdcb8b1475cb9f9ed7836c76aa1,

title = "Scrum Code Camps",

abstract = "A classic way to choose a supplier is through a bidding process where tenders from competing companies are evaluated in relation to the customer{\textquoteright}s requirements. If the customer wants to hire an agile software developing team instead of buying a software product, a new approach for comparing tenders is required. In this paper we present the design of such a new approach, the Scrum Code Camp, which can be used to assess agile team capability in a transparent and consistent way. A design science research approach is used to analyze properties of two instances of the Scrum Code Camp where seven agile teams were evaluated. ",

author = "Jan Pries-Heje and Lene Pries-Heje and Bente Dahlgaard",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1109/AGILE.2013.29",

language = "English",

volume = "2013",

series = "Agile Conference 2013",

publisher = "IEEE",

pages = "64--73",

booktitle = "Agile Conference (AGILE) 2013",

address = "United States",

note = "AGILE 2013 ; Conference date: 05-08-2013 Through 09-08-2013",

url = "http://agile2013.agilealliance.org/",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Scrum Code Camps

AU - Pries-Heje, Jan

AU - Pries-Heje, Lene

AU - Dahlgaard, Bente

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - A classic way to choose a supplier is through a bidding process where tenders from competing companies are evaluated in relation to the customer’s requirements. If the customer wants to hire an agile software developing team instead of buying a software product, a new approach for comparing tenders is required. In this paper we present the design of such a new approach, the Scrum Code Camp, which can be used to assess agile team capability in a transparent and consistent way. A design science research approach is used to analyze properties of two instances of the Scrum Code Camp where seven agile teams were evaluated.

AB - A classic way to choose a supplier is through a bidding process where tenders from competing companies are evaluated in relation to the customer’s requirements. If the customer wants to hire an agile software developing team instead of buying a software product, a new approach for comparing tenders is required. In this paper we present the design of such a new approach, the Scrum Code Camp, which can be used to assess agile team capability in a transparent and consistent way. A design science research approach is used to analyze properties of two instances of the Scrum Code Camp where seven agile teams were evaluated.

U2 - 10.1109/AGILE.2013.29

DO - 10.1109/AGILE.2013.29

M3 - Article in proceedings

VL - 2013

T3 - Agile Conference 2013

SP - 64

EP - 73

BT - Agile Conference (AGILE) 2013

PB - IEEE

T2 - AGILE 2013

Y2 - 5 August 2013 through 9 August 2013

ER -