Responsible decision-making for plant research and breeding innovations in the European Union

Ulf Dennis Eriksson, Sevasti Chatzopoulou

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Plant research and breeding has made substantial technical progress over the past few decades, indicating a potential for tremendous societal impact. Due to this potential, the development of policies and legislation on plant breeding and the technical progress should preferably involve all relevant stakeholders. However, we argue here that there is a substantial imbalance in the European Union (EU) regarding the influence of the various stakeholder groups on policy makers. We use evidence from three examples in order to show that the role of science is overlooked: 1) important delays in the decision process concerning the authorization of genetically modified (GM) maize events, 2) the significance attributed to non-scientific reasons in new legislation concerning the prohibition of GM events in EU member states, and 3) failure of the European Commission to deliver legal guidance to new plant breeding techniques despite sufficient scientific evidence and advisory reports. We attribute this imbalance to misinformation and misinterpretation of public perceptions and a disproportionate attention to single outlier reports, and we present ideas on how to establish a better stakeholder balance within this field.
Original languageEnglish
JournalG M Crops & Food
Volume8
Issue number4
Number of pages13
ISSN2164-5698
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Oct 2017

Keywords

  • plant research
  • breeding
  • innovation
  • RRI
  • European Union

Cite this

@article{17f3556f4f8a42f58ec2c477c9b579f2,
title = "Responsible decision-making for plant research and breeding innovations in the European Union",
abstract = "Plant research and breeding has made substantial technical progress over the past few decades, indicating a potential for tremendous societal impact. Due to this potential, the development of policies and legislation on plant breeding and the technical progress should preferably involve all relevant stakeholders. However, we argue here that there is a substantial imbalance in the European Union (EU) regarding the influence of the various stakeholder groups on policy makers. We use evidence from three examples in order to show that the role of science is overlooked: 1) important delays in the decision process concerning the authorization of genetically modified (GM) maize events, 2) the significance attributed to non-scientific reasons in new legislation concerning the prohibition of GM events in EU member states, and 3) failure of the European Commission to deliver legal guidance to new plant breeding techniques despite sufficient scientific evidence and advisory reports. We attribute this imbalance to misinformation and misinterpretation of public perceptions and a disproportionate attention to single outlier reports, and we present ideas on how to establish a better stakeholder balance within this field.",
keywords = "plant research, breeding, innovation, RRI , European Union, plant research, breeding, innovation, RRI, European Union",
author = "Eriksson, {Ulf Dennis} and Sevasti Chatzopoulou",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1080/21645698.2017.1388496",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "G M Crops & Food",
issn = "2164-5698",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Responsible decision-making for plant research and breeding innovations in the European Union. / Eriksson, Ulf Dennis; Chatzopoulou, Sevasti.

In: G M Crops & Food, Vol. 8, No. 4, 09.10.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responsible decision-making for plant research and breeding innovations in the European Union

AU - Eriksson, Ulf Dennis

AU - Chatzopoulou, Sevasti

PY - 2017/10/9

Y1 - 2017/10/9

N2 - Plant research and breeding has made substantial technical progress over the past few decades, indicating a potential for tremendous societal impact. Due to this potential, the development of policies and legislation on plant breeding and the technical progress should preferably involve all relevant stakeholders. However, we argue here that there is a substantial imbalance in the European Union (EU) regarding the influence of the various stakeholder groups on policy makers. We use evidence from three examples in order to show that the role of science is overlooked: 1) important delays in the decision process concerning the authorization of genetically modified (GM) maize events, 2) the significance attributed to non-scientific reasons in new legislation concerning the prohibition of GM events in EU member states, and 3) failure of the European Commission to deliver legal guidance to new plant breeding techniques despite sufficient scientific evidence and advisory reports. We attribute this imbalance to misinformation and misinterpretation of public perceptions and a disproportionate attention to single outlier reports, and we present ideas on how to establish a better stakeholder balance within this field.

AB - Plant research and breeding has made substantial technical progress over the past few decades, indicating a potential for tremendous societal impact. Due to this potential, the development of policies and legislation on plant breeding and the technical progress should preferably involve all relevant stakeholders. However, we argue here that there is a substantial imbalance in the European Union (EU) regarding the influence of the various stakeholder groups on policy makers. We use evidence from three examples in order to show that the role of science is overlooked: 1) important delays in the decision process concerning the authorization of genetically modified (GM) maize events, 2) the significance attributed to non-scientific reasons in new legislation concerning the prohibition of GM events in EU member states, and 3) failure of the European Commission to deliver legal guidance to new plant breeding techniques despite sufficient scientific evidence and advisory reports. We attribute this imbalance to misinformation and misinterpretation of public perceptions and a disproportionate attention to single outlier reports, and we present ideas on how to establish a better stakeholder balance within this field.

KW - plant research

KW - breeding

KW - innovation

KW - RRI

KW - European Union

KW - plant research

KW - breeding

KW - innovation

KW - RRI

KW - European Union

U2 - 10.1080/21645698.2017.1388496

DO - 10.1080/21645698.2017.1388496

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

JO - G M Crops & Food

JF - G M Crops & Food

SN - 2164-5698

IS - 4

ER -