Abstract
In many contexts, states have a duty to take special measures to protect minorities. Does this duty include prioritizing minority over majority refugees? To answer this question, we first show that a vulnerability-focused notion of ‘minorities’ is preferable to a numerical one. Given the vulnerability-focused notion, there is a presumption in favour of prioritizing minority over majority refugees. However, this presumption is sometimes defeated. We identify five conditions under which this is the case. In fact, surprisingly, under special circumstances, states should prioritize certain majority over certain minority refugees.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Book series | Ethics and Global Politics |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 1 |
Pages (from-to) | 79-92 |
Number of pages | 13 |
ISSN | 1654-4951 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 29 Mar 2020 |
Keywords
- Concept of a minority
- duty to rescue and refugees
- ethics of migration
- global justice
- minority protection
- minority rights
- non-ideal theory
- principle of irrelevant goods
- refugees and justice
- vulnerability