Reactive Case Detection Strategy for Malaria Control and Elimination: A 12 Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis from 25 Malaria-Endemic Countries

Ebenezer Krampah Aidoo*, Frank Twum Aboagye, Felix Abekah Botchway, George Osei-Adjei, Michael Appiah, Ruth Duku-Takyi, Samuel Asamoah Sakyi, Linda Amoah, Kingsley Badu, Richard Harry Asmah, Bernard Walter Lawson, Karen Angeliki Krogfelt*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

Abstract

Reactive case detection (RACD) is the screening of household members and neighbors of index cases reported in passive surveillance. This strategy seeks asymptomatic infections and provides treatment to break transmission without testing or treating the entire population. This review discusses and highlights RACD as a recommended strategy for the detection and elimination of asymptomatic malaria as it pertains in different countries. Relevant studies published between January 2010 and September 2022 were identified mainly through PubMed and Google Scholar. Search terms included “malaria and reactive case detection”, “contact tracing”, “focal screening”, “case investigation”, “focal screen and treat”. MedCalc Software was used for data analysis, and the findings from the pooled studies were analyzed using a fixed-effect model. Summary outcomes were then presented using forest plots and tables. Fifty-four (54) studies were systematically reviewed. Of these studies, 7 met the eligibility criteria based on risk of malaria infection in individuals living with an index case < 5 years old, 13 met the eligibility criteria based on risk of malaria infection in an index case household member compared with a neighbor of an index case, and 29 met the eligibility criteria based on risk of malaria infection in individuals living with index cases, and were included in the meta-analysis. Individuals living in index case households with an average risk of 2.576 (2.540–2.612) were more at risk of malaria infection and showed pooled results of high variation heterogeneity chi-square = 235.600, (p < 0.0001) I2 = 98.88 [97.87–99.89]. The pooled results showed that neighbors of index cases were 0.352 [0.301–0.412] times more likely to have a malaria infection relative to index case household members, and this result was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The identification and treatment of infectious reservoirs is critical to successful malaria elimination. Evidence to support the clustering of infections in neighborhoods, which necessitates the inclusion of neighboring households as part of the RACD strategy, was presented in this review.

Original languageEnglish
Article number180
JournalTropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Volume8
Issue number3
ISSN2414-6366
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Lundbeck Foundation (R349-2020-703) support research to KA Krogfelt, RUC, DK.

Keywords

  • index cases
  • infection reservoir
  • malaria control and elimination
  • passive surveillance
  • reactive case detection
  • epidemiology
  • endemic malaria
  • malaria control

Cite this