Quality Development in Health Care: Participation vs. Accreditation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

For more than a decade, quality development in the Danish health care sector has been managed with an accreditation system known as the Danish quality model (DQM), shaping the strategy for how to align work organization with technology use. In this article, we introduce a participatory design approach, known as effects-driven information technology development (EDIT), and discuss how this approach may contribute to a new quality-assurance program for the Danish health care sector. Our purpose is to demonstrate how accreditation, which focuses on processes and standards, needs to be supplemented and balanced with participatory approaches that allow for local experimentation and implementation of high-quality outcomes. We describe accreditation and participatory design as two approaches to recon guring and aligning work organization and technology; further, we emphasize the differences in each approach’s strategy and application.
LanguageEnglish
JournalNordic Journal of Working Life Studies
Volume8
Issue numberSpecial Issue No. S3
ISSN2245-0157
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2018

Cite this

@article{e698d9698dff42e6b1ada63782b25ace,
title = "Quality Development in Health Care: Participation vs. Accreditation",
abstract = "For more than a decade, quality development in the Danish health care sector has been managed with an accreditation system known as the Danish quality model (DQM), shaping the strategy for how to align work organization with technology use. In this article, we introduce a participatory design approach, known as effects-driven information technology development (EDIT), and discuss how this approach may contribute to a new quality-assurance program for the Danish health care sector. Our purpose is to demonstrate how accreditation, which focuses on processes and standards, needs to be supplemented and balanced with participatory approaches that allow for local experimentation and implementation of high-quality outcomes. We describe accreditation and participatory design as two approaches to recon guring and aligning work organization and technology; further, we emphasize the differences in each approach’s strategy and application.",
author = "Jesper Simonsen and Morten Hertzum and Scheuer, {John Damm}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.18291/njwls.v8iS3.105276",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies",
issn = "2245-0157",
publisher = "Roskilde Universitet",
number = "Special Issue No. S3",

}

Quality Development in Health Care : Participation vs. Accreditation. / Simonsen, Jesper; Hertzum, Morten; Scheuer, John Damm.

In: Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, Vol. 8, No. Special Issue No. S3, 15.04.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality Development in Health Care

T2 - Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies

AU - Simonsen, Jesper

AU - Hertzum, Morten

AU - Scheuer, John Damm

PY - 2018/4/15

Y1 - 2018/4/15

N2 - For more than a decade, quality development in the Danish health care sector has been managed with an accreditation system known as the Danish quality model (DQM), shaping the strategy for how to align work organization with technology use. In this article, we introduce a participatory design approach, known as effects-driven information technology development (EDIT), and discuss how this approach may contribute to a new quality-assurance program for the Danish health care sector. Our purpose is to demonstrate how accreditation, which focuses on processes and standards, needs to be supplemented and balanced with participatory approaches that allow for local experimentation and implementation of high-quality outcomes. We describe accreditation and participatory design as two approaches to recon guring and aligning work organization and technology; further, we emphasize the differences in each approach’s strategy and application.

AB - For more than a decade, quality development in the Danish health care sector has been managed with an accreditation system known as the Danish quality model (DQM), shaping the strategy for how to align work organization with technology use. In this article, we introduce a participatory design approach, known as effects-driven information technology development (EDIT), and discuss how this approach may contribute to a new quality-assurance program for the Danish health care sector. Our purpose is to demonstrate how accreditation, which focuses on processes and standards, needs to be supplemented and balanced with participatory approaches that allow for local experimentation and implementation of high-quality outcomes. We describe accreditation and participatory design as two approaches to recon guring and aligning work organization and technology; further, we emphasize the differences in each approach’s strategy and application.

U2 - 10.18291/njwls.v8iS3.105276

DO - 10.18291/njwls.v8iS3.105276

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

JO - Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies

JF - Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies

SN - 2245-0157

IS - Special Issue No. S3

ER -