Qualifications Frameworks and their conflicting social imaginaries of globalisation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Critics often see the European Bologna Process as a univocal standardisation of higher education. By exploring how different qualifications frameworks project different social imaginaries of globalisation, this article takes a different stance. The overarching qualifications framework of the Bologna Process rests on a socially constituted and contested concept of globalisation as a change towards a more diverse and unforeseeable world, which calls for the development of flexible, lifelong learners with a broad knowledge base and strong democratic competencies. Although this social imaginary is widely known, I argue that it is also highly contested. For example, the Danish qualifications framework of 2003 projects a social imaginary of globalisation as a change towards a smaller and more predictable world, which enables a novel and more efficient alignment of the curriculum towards specific professional needs, and where the development of a broad knowledge base and democratic competencies are no longer prioritised
Original languageEnglish
Article number2
JournalLearning and Teaching: The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences
Volume5
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)22-38
Number of pages17
ISSN1755-2273
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2013
Externally publishedYes

Cite this