Organizational oratory as the art of addressing multiple and mutually antagonistic audiences

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose:
The purpose of this paper is to investigate how organizational orators cope with situations where they must simultaneously address several audiences with clashing interests, conflicting identities and contradictory interpretations of crucial issues.

Design/methodology/approach:
The paper draws on both the classical rhetorical tradition and various contemporary disciplines to delineate, conceptualize and critically discuss a repertoire of rhetorical strategies for dealing with composite audiences.

Findings:
There are at least nine distinct strategies for dealing with the problem. Most of them make problematic assumptions about audiences. The most promising strategy involves shifting and blending frames.

Practical implications:
Most managers will sometimes stand in situations where they have to cope with multiple and mutually antagonistic audiences. This paper provides practical suggestions for how to go about it.

Originality/value:
The paper isolates and investigates a problem that was largely overlooked by classical rhetoricians, and contemporary scholars still underestimate its ubiquity, its complexity and its urgency. Apart from improving our grasp of the problem, the paper provides a comprehensive overview of potential solutions, and shows their shortcomings.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Organizational Change Management
Volume32
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)282-295
Number of pages13
ISSN0953-4814
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2019

Keywords

  • rhetorical strategies
  • conflicting interests and identities
  • multiple antagonistic audiences
  • organizational rhetoric

Cite this

@article{5fe8c2c3534a471ea2f7053df5e60059,
title = "Organizational oratory as the art of addressing multiple and mutually antagonistic audiences",
abstract = "Purpose:The purpose of this paper is to investigate how organizational orators cope with situations where they must simultaneously address several audiences with clashing interests, conflicting identities and contradictory interpretations of crucial issues.Design/methodology/approach:The paper draws on both the classical rhetorical tradition and various contemporary disciplines to delineate, conceptualize and critically discuss a repertoire of rhetorical strategies for dealing with composite audiences.Findings:There are at least nine distinct strategies for dealing with the problem. Most of them make problematic assumptions about audiences. The most promising strategy involves shifting and blending frames.Practical implications:Most managers will sometimes stand in situations where they have to cope with multiple and mutually antagonistic audiences. This paper provides practical suggestions for how to go about it.Originality/value:The paper isolates and investigates a problem that was largely overlooked by classical rhetoricians, and contemporary scholars still underestimate its ubiquity, its complexity and its urgency. Apart from improving our grasp of the problem, the paper provides a comprehensive overview of potential solutions, and shows their shortcomings.",
keywords = "rhetorical strategies, conflicting interests and identities, multiple antagonistic audiences, organizational rhetoric",
author = "Nico Mouton",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1108/JOCM-09-2018-0263",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "282--295",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Change Management",
issn = "0953-4814",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "2",

}

Organizational oratory as the art of addressing multiple and mutually antagonistic audiences. / Mouton, Nico.

In: Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 32, No. 2, 02.04.2019, p. 282-295.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizational oratory as the art of addressing multiple and mutually antagonistic audiences

AU - Mouton, Nico

PY - 2019/4/2

Y1 - 2019/4/2

N2 - Purpose:The purpose of this paper is to investigate how organizational orators cope with situations where they must simultaneously address several audiences with clashing interests, conflicting identities and contradictory interpretations of crucial issues.Design/methodology/approach:The paper draws on both the classical rhetorical tradition and various contemporary disciplines to delineate, conceptualize and critically discuss a repertoire of rhetorical strategies for dealing with composite audiences.Findings:There are at least nine distinct strategies for dealing with the problem. Most of them make problematic assumptions about audiences. The most promising strategy involves shifting and blending frames.Practical implications:Most managers will sometimes stand in situations where they have to cope with multiple and mutually antagonistic audiences. This paper provides practical suggestions for how to go about it.Originality/value:The paper isolates and investigates a problem that was largely overlooked by classical rhetoricians, and contemporary scholars still underestimate its ubiquity, its complexity and its urgency. Apart from improving our grasp of the problem, the paper provides a comprehensive overview of potential solutions, and shows their shortcomings.

AB - Purpose:The purpose of this paper is to investigate how organizational orators cope with situations where they must simultaneously address several audiences with clashing interests, conflicting identities and contradictory interpretations of crucial issues.Design/methodology/approach:The paper draws on both the classical rhetorical tradition and various contemporary disciplines to delineate, conceptualize and critically discuss a repertoire of rhetorical strategies for dealing with composite audiences.Findings:There are at least nine distinct strategies for dealing with the problem. Most of them make problematic assumptions about audiences. The most promising strategy involves shifting and blending frames.Practical implications:Most managers will sometimes stand in situations where they have to cope with multiple and mutually antagonistic audiences. This paper provides practical suggestions for how to go about it.Originality/value:The paper isolates and investigates a problem that was largely overlooked by classical rhetoricians, and contemporary scholars still underestimate its ubiquity, its complexity and its urgency. Apart from improving our grasp of the problem, the paper provides a comprehensive overview of potential solutions, and shows their shortcomings.

KW - rhetorical strategies

KW - conflicting interests and identities

KW - multiple antagonistic audiences

KW - organizational rhetoric

U2 - 10.1108/JOCM-09-2018-0263

DO - 10.1108/JOCM-09-2018-0263

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

SP - 282

EP - 295

JO - Journal of Organizational Change Management

JF - Journal of Organizational Change Management

SN - 0953-4814

IS - 2

ER -