Government Disaster Response and Narrative Retrospection: A Comparative Study of the Electoral Impacts in Denmark and Sweden of the 2004 Tsunami

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review


This paper investigates the nexus between disaster response and voting behaviour through a comparative study of the electoral dynamics in the immediate aftermath of the 2004 Tsunami in Denmark and Sweden. The paper addresses three hypotheses of retrospection: (i) blind retrospection where voters primarily take the disaster impacts into account; (ii) mediated retrospection where voters primarily take the quality of the disaster response into account; and (iii) narrative retrospection where voters primarily take the dominant political narrative of the disaster into account. The results suggest that voters did not appear to immediately punish the Danish and Swedish governments for the Tsunami despite the severe impacts and the widespread public disapproval of the governments’ disaster responses. The concept of narrative retrospection shows how there was limited pressure to politicize the government’s disaster management efforts in Denmark, while the brunt of the political blame in Sweden occurred more than a year after the Tsunami.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDisaster Management and Human Health Risk V
EditorsC.A. Brebbia
Number of pages11
PublisherWIT Press
Publication date2017
ISBN (Print)978-1-78466-187-8
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-78466-188-5
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Event5th International Conference on Disaster Management and Human Health: Reducing Risk, Improving Outcomes - Sevilla, Spain
Duration: 7 Jun 20179 Jun 2017
Conference number: 5


Conference5th International Conference on Disaster Management and Human Health
SeriesW I T Transactions on the Built Environment


  • Denmark
  • Retrospection
  • Sweden
  • Tsunami
  • Voting

Cite this