Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

From Industrial Modernity to Risk Modernity? A Critical Discussion of the Theory of the ’Risk Society’ 1

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

One of the most obvious objections to the hypothesis of a ‘risk society’ is that we have always been confronted with risk: earthquakes, floods, plague, cholera etc. And not only have we always been confronted with risk, one can even claim that in some respects our existence today is less risky than it was just a hundred years ago. The way to determine whether the consequences of a given action constitute a risk or a danger has to do with the question of who makes the decision. For the one who decides the consequences of the action appear as risk; for the one who is affected the consequences appear as danger. In Risk Society Beck speaks indiscriminately of risk and danger; in addition he points out the difficulties in connecting given risks with certain causes. In late modernity, however, we are increasingly confronted with new types of risk, namely ‘high-consequence risks’ and ‘manufactured uncertainty’.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Transformation of Modernity : Aspects of the past, present and future of an era
EditorsMikael Carleheden, Michael Hviid Jacobsen
Number of pages21
Place of PublicationLondon and New York
PublisherRoutledge
Publication date2019
Pages19-40
Chapter2
ISBN (Print)9781138703230
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
SeriesRoutledge Revivals

Bibliographical note

This title was first published in 2001: Now part of Routledge Revivals

Citation Styles