European defence industry consolidation and domestic procurement bias

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

How have European cross-border defence industrial mergers and acquisitions affected domestic procurement bias among the major EU powers? This article departs from the findings of Andrew Moravcsik more than two decades ago suggesting that major West European states had no ingrained preferences for defence industrial autarchy. When cross-national armament projects were
derailed, this could be attributed to political efforts of national defence industrial champions favouring purely domestic projects. As former national champions join pan-European defence groups, their preferences are likely modified. Does this shift procurement towards non-European “off-the-shelf” solutions which, according to Moravcsik, are favoured by defence departments? Or does it give impetus to a stronger preference for European as opposed to
domestic systems? In this article, procurement patterns in the aftermath of cross-border defence industry consolidation will be analysed. Procurement bias is assessed in two industry segments characterised by pervasive consolidation.
Original languageEnglish
JournalDefense and Security Analysis
Volume33
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)158-173
Number of pages17
ISSN1475-1798
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2017

Keywords

  • Defence electronics
  • Defence industry
  • Defence procurement
  • European integration
  • Guided missiles
  • Mergers and acquisitions

Cite this