Emotions as method

Obtrusiveness and participant observation in public bureaucracies

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Based on a case-study of the governance of health facilities in Niger, the paper examines how emotions can be used as a method to explore meaning-making activities in bureaucratic settings where public servants’ behaviours follow practical norms that deviate from both official norms and social norms. As a supplement to other techniques associated with long-term field research, the use of obtrusive participant-observation is arguably a relevant and fruitful methodological tactic. The author argues that giving space to the ethnographer’s empathy while doing participant-observation enables a deeper understanding of bureaucratic behaviours by bringing emotions back into the analysis of empirical findings and deepening reflexivity. Whereas the paper examines some ethical issues associated with this method in contexts where the ethnographer is confronted with abuse of power in health bureaucracies, the author suggests that emotions as method can be a fruitful approach to bureaucratic ethnography at large.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCritique of Anthropology
Volume39
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)188-204
Number of pages17
ISSN0308-275X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Keywords

  • emotion
  • participant observation
  • obtrusiveness
  • health
  • bureaucracy
  • ethics

Cite this

@article{7afdc78b7f2e4905aac1f609ff0aeab4,
title = "Emotions as method: Obtrusiveness and participant observation in public bureaucracies",
abstract = "Based on a case-study of the governance of health facilities in Niger, the paper examines how emotions can be used as a method to explore meaning-making activities in bureaucratic settings where public servants’ behaviours follow practical norms that deviate from both official norms and social norms. As a supplement to other techniques associated with long-term field research, the use of obtrusive participant-observation is arguably a relevant and fruitful methodological tactic. The author argues that giving space to the ethnographer’s empathy while doing participant-observation enables a deeper understanding of bureaucratic behaviours by bringing emotions back into the analysis of empirical findings and deepening reflexivity. Whereas the paper examines some ethical issues associated with this method in contexts where the ethnographer is confronted with abuse of power in health bureaucracies, the author suggests that emotions as method can be a fruitful approach to bureaucratic ethnography at large.",
keywords = "emotion, participant observation, obtrusiveness, health, bureaucracy, ethics, emotion, participant observation, obtrusiveness, health, bureaucracy, ethics",
author = "Hahonou, {Eric Komlavi}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/0308275X19842923",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "188--204",
journal = "Critique of Anthropology",
issn = "0308-275X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

Emotions as method : Obtrusiveness and participant observation in public bureaucracies. / Hahonou, Eric Komlavi.

In: Critique of Anthropology, Vol. 39, No. 2, 06.2019, p. 188-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emotions as method

T2 - Obtrusiveness and participant observation in public bureaucracies

AU - Hahonou, Eric Komlavi

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Based on a case-study of the governance of health facilities in Niger, the paper examines how emotions can be used as a method to explore meaning-making activities in bureaucratic settings where public servants’ behaviours follow practical norms that deviate from both official norms and social norms. As a supplement to other techniques associated with long-term field research, the use of obtrusive participant-observation is arguably a relevant and fruitful methodological tactic. The author argues that giving space to the ethnographer’s empathy while doing participant-observation enables a deeper understanding of bureaucratic behaviours by bringing emotions back into the analysis of empirical findings and deepening reflexivity. Whereas the paper examines some ethical issues associated with this method in contexts where the ethnographer is confronted with abuse of power in health bureaucracies, the author suggests that emotions as method can be a fruitful approach to bureaucratic ethnography at large.

AB - Based on a case-study of the governance of health facilities in Niger, the paper examines how emotions can be used as a method to explore meaning-making activities in bureaucratic settings where public servants’ behaviours follow practical norms that deviate from both official norms and social norms. As a supplement to other techniques associated with long-term field research, the use of obtrusive participant-observation is arguably a relevant and fruitful methodological tactic. The author argues that giving space to the ethnographer’s empathy while doing participant-observation enables a deeper understanding of bureaucratic behaviours by bringing emotions back into the analysis of empirical findings and deepening reflexivity. Whereas the paper examines some ethical issues associated with this method in contexts where the ethnographer is confronted with abuse of power in health bureaucracies, the author suggests that emotions as method can be a fruitful approach to bureaucratic ethnography at large.

KW - emotion

KW - participant observation

KW - obtrusiveness

KW - health

KW - bureaucracy

KW - ethics

KW - emotion

KW - participant observation

KW - obtrusiveness

KW - health

KW - bureaucracy

KW - ethics

U2 - 10.1177/0308275X19842923

DO - 10.1177/0308275X19842923

M3 - Journal article

VL - 39

SP - 188

EP - 204

JO - Critique of Anthropology

JF - Critique of Anthropology

SN - 0308-275X

IS - 2

ER -