(Dis)organizing through imbrications of human and material agencies

the case of fighting and surviving a battle

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearch

Abstract

This paper sets out to contribute to the discourse on the role of sociomateriality in enabling and/or constraining organizing processes. Scholars have emphasized that organizing processes include moments of order, as well as disorder, and that those moments emerge through the imbrication of human and material agencies. However there is a lack of insight into how human and material agencies are imbricated during the emergence of (dis)order, and how different imbrications lead to (dis)order. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a content analysis of a book reporting the Battle of Stalingrad during World War II. Drawing on the theory of affordances, the author identifies how different materials were used by the German and Soviet armies to organize specific activities, and whether and how those activities led to order and/or disorder. The analysis suggests that soldiers used different materials to organize different activities within one and the same organizational context, which led to (dis)order. Whether order or disorder emerged was dependent on how human and material agencies were imbricated within the conduct of particular activities, and how they related to internal or external influencing factors. The findings contribute to increasing our understanding of how different types of imbrications of human and material agencies lead to (dis)order.
Original languageEnglish
Publication date2016
Number of pages31
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes
Event32nd EGOS Colloquium, Naples 2016: Organizing in the Shadow of Power - Naples, Italy
Duration: 7 Jul 20169 Jul 2016
https://www.egosnet.org/2016_naples/general_theme

Conference

Conference32nd EGOS Colloquium, Naples 2016
CountryItaly
CityNaples
Period07/07/201609/07/2016
Internet address

Cite this

@conference{18dfb14a2b3143f88648d06bca62356d,
title = "(Dis)organizing through imbrications of human and material agencies: the case of fighting and surviving a battle",
abstract = "This paper sets out to contribute to the discourse on the role of sociomateriality in enabling and/or constraining organizing processes. Scholars have emphasized that organizing processes include moments of order, as well as disorder, and that those moments emerge through the imbrication of human and material agencies. However there is a lack of insight into how human and material agencies are imbricated during the emergence of (dis)order, and how different imbrications lead to (dis)order. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a content analysis of a book reporting the Battle of Stalingrad during World War II. Drawing on the theory of affordances, the author identifies how different materials were used by the German and Soviet armies to organize specific activities, and whether and how those activities led to order and/or disorder. The analysis suggests that soldiers used different materials to organize different activities within one and the same organizational context, which led to (dis)order. Whether order or disorder emerged was dependent on how human and material agencies were imbricated within the conduct of particular activities, and how they related to internal or external influencing factors. The findings contribute to increasing our understanding of how different types of imbrications of human and material agencies lead to (dis)order.",
author = "Elena Tavella",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
note = "32nd EGOS Colloquium, Naples 2016 : Organizing in the Shadow of Power ; Conference date: 07-07-2016 Through 09-07-2016",
url = "https://www.egosnet.org/2016_naples/general_theme",

}

Tavella, E 2016, '(Dis)organizing through imbrications of human and material agencies: the case of fighting and surviving a battle' Paper presented at 32nd EGOS Colloquium, Naples 2016, Naples, Italy, 07/07/2016 - 09/07/2016, .

(Dis)organizing through imbrications of human and material agencies : the case of fighting and surviving a battle. / Tavella, Elena.

2016. Paper presented at 32nd EGOS Colloquium, Naples 2016, Naples, Italy.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearch

TY - CONF

T1 - (Dis)organizing through imbrications of human and material agencies

T2 - the case of fighting and surviving a battle

AU - Tavella, Elena

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This paper sets out to contribute to the discourse on the role of sociomateriality in enabling and/or constraining organizing processes. Scholars have emphasized that organizing processes include moments of order, as well as disorder, and that those moments emerge through the imbrication of human and material agencies. However there is a lack of insight into how human and material agencies are imbricated during the emergence of (dis)order, and how different imbrications lead to (dis)order. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a content analysis of a book reporting the Battle of Stalingrad during World War II. Drawing on the theory of affordances, the author identifies how different materials were used by the German and Soviet armies to organize specific activities, and whether and how those activities led to order and/or disorder. The analysis suggests that soldiers used different materials to organize different activities within one and the same organizational context, which led to (dis)order. Whether order or disorder emerged was dependent on how human and material agencies were imbricated within the conduct of particular activities, and how they related to internal or external influencing factors. The findings contribute to increasing our understanding of how different types of imbrications of human and material agencies lead to (dis)order.

AB - This paper sets out to contribute to the discourse on the role of sociomateriality in enabling and/or constraining organizing processes. Scholars have emphasized that organizing processes include moments of order, as well as disorder, and that those moments emerge through the imbrication of human and material agencies. However there is a lack of insight into how human and material agencies are imbricated during the emergence of (dis)order, and how different imbrications lead to (dis)order. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a content analysis of a book reporting the Battle of Stalingrad during World War II. Drawing on the theory of affordances, the author identifies how different materials were used by the German and Soviet armies to organize specific activities, and whether and how those activities led to order and/or disorder. The analysis suggests that soldiers used different materials to organize different activities within one and the same organizational context, which led to (dis)order. Whether order or disorder emerged was dependent on how human and material agencies were imbricated within the conduct of particular activities, and how they related to internal or external influencing factors. The findings contribute to increasing our understanding of how different types of imbrications of human and material agencies lead to (dis)order.

M3 - Paper

ER -