Deliberating Climate Change: The Case of the global citizen consultation, World Wide Views on Global Warming

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The global event World Wide Views on Global Warming (WWV), initiated by the Danish Board of Technology (DBT), took place on September 26, 2009, and was an innovative attempt to gather a united citizen voice on a global scale. As such the WWV is one of the most recent experiments with new ways to include the voice of the citizens into complex scientific and technological issues. The purpose of WWV was to pass on the opinions of ordinary citizens to political decision-makers at The United Nations Climate Summit, COP15, in Copenhagen in December 2009. The authors made a study of the Danish WWV event including a) observations on the Danish location, b) survey among the participants, c) follow-up focus group interview with voluntary participants, and d) interview with the organizers of the global event from DBT. Based on this study we analyse how the deliberation was institutionally framed. This includes considerations regarding how the process was designed in order to be legitimate as a voice for citizens, how different types of knowledge and expert identities were created and negotiated in the event, and how the framing influenced the outcome. The specific conditions of the event, i.e. the relation to a high-policy global summit like COP15, are also considered in the discussion about the WWV as innovative design. The analysis draws upon theoretical perspectives of deliberative democracy and STS studies of public engagement with science.
Original languageEnglish
Publication date2010
Number of pages20
Publication statusPublished - 2010
EventSunrise Triple C Conference : Climate, Change, and Communication - Roskilde Universitet, Roskilde, Denmark
Duration: 20 Apr 201022 Apr 2010
http://ruconf.ruc.dk/index.php/sunrise/sunrise2010

Conference

ConferenceSunrise Triple C Conference
LocationRoskilde Universitet
CountryDenmark
CityRoskilde
Period20/04/201022/04/2010
Internet address

Cite this

@conference{1ad23e104c8d11dfa130000ea68e967b,
title = "Deliberating Climate Change: The Case of the global citizen consultation, World Wide Views on Global Warming",
abstract = "The global event World Wide Views on Global Warming (WWV), initiated by the Danish Board of Technology (DBT), took place on September 26, 2009, and was an innovative attempt to gather a united citizen voice on a global scale. As such the WWV is one of the most recent experiments with new ways to include the voice of the citizens into complex scientific and technological issues. The purpose of WWV was to pass on the opinions of ordinary citizens to political decision-makers at The United Nations Climate Summit, COP15, in Copenhagen in December 2009. The authors made a study of the Danish WWV event including a) observations on the Danish location, b) survey among the participants, c) follow-up focus group interview with voluntary participants, and d) interview with the organizers of the global event from DBT. Based on this study we analyse how the deliberation was institutionally framed. This includes considerations regarding how the process was designed in order to be legitimate as a voice for citizens, how different types of knowledge and expert identities were created and negotiated in the event, and how the framing influenced the outcome. The specific conditions of the event, i.e. the relation to a high-policy global summit like COP15, are also considered in the discussion about the WWV as innovative design. The analysis draws upon theoretical perspectives of deliberative democracy and STS studies of public engagement with science.",
author = "Annika Agger and Erling Jels{\o}e and Birgit J{\ae}ger and Phillips, {Louise Jane}",
note = "Sider: 1-19; null ; Conference date: 20-04-2010 Through 22-04-2010",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
url = "http://ruconf.ruc.dk/index.php/sunrise/sunrise2010",

}

Deliberating Climate Change : The Case of the global citizen consultation, World Wide Views on Global Warming. / Agger, Annika; Jelsøe, Erling; Jæger, Birgit; Phillips, Louise Jane.

2010. Paper presented at Sunrise Triple C Conference , Roskilde, Denmark.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Deliberating Climate Change

T2 - The Case of the global citizen consultation, World Wide Views on Global Warming

AU - Agger, Annika

AU - Jelsøe, Erling

AU - Jæger, Birgit

AU - Phillips, Louise Jane

N1 - Sider: 1-19

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The global event World Wide Views on Global Warming (WWV), initiated by the Danish Board of Technology (DBT), took place on September 26, 2009, and was an innovative attempt to gather a united citizen voice on a global scale. As such the WWV is one of the most recent experiments with new ways to include the voice of the citizens into complex scientific and technological issues. The purpose of WWV was to pass on the opinions of ordinary citizens to political decision-makers at The United Nations Climate Summit, COP15, in Copenhagen in December 2009. The authors made a study of the Danish WWV event including a) observations on the Danish location, b) survey among the participants, c) follow-up focus group interview with voluntary participants, and d) interview with the organizers of the global event from DBT. Based on this study we analyse how the deliberation was institutionally framed. This includes considerations regarding how the process was designed in order to be legitimate as a voice for citizens, how different types of knowledge and expert identities were created and negotiated in the event, and how the framing influenced the outcome. The specific conditions of the event, i.e. the relation to a high-policy global summit like COP15, are also considered in the discussion about the WWV as innovative design. The analysis draws upon theoretical perspectives of deliberative democracy and STS studies of public engagement with science.

AB - The global event World Wide Views on Global Warming (WWV), initiated by the Danish Board of Technology (DBT), took place on September 26, 2009, and was an innovative attempt to gather a united citizen voice on a global scale. As such the WWV is one of the most recent experiments with new ways to include the voice of the citizens into complex scientific and technological issues. The purpose of WWV was to pass on the opinions of ordinary citizens to political decision-makers at The United Nations Climate Summit, COP15, in Copenhagen in December 2009. The authors made a study of the Danish WWV event including a) observations on the Danish location, b) survey among the participants, c) follow-up focus group interview with voluntary participants, and d) interview with the organizers of the global event from DBT. Based on this study we analyse how the deliberation was institutionally framed. This includes considerations regarding how the process was designed in order to be legitimate as a voice for citizens, how different types of knowledge and expert identities were created and negotiated in the event, and how the framing influenced the outcome. The specific conditions of the event, i.e. the relation to a high-policy global summit like COP15, are also considered in the discussion about the WWV as innovative design. The analysis draws upon theoretical perspectives of deliberative democracy and STS studies of public engagement with science.

M3 - Paper

ER -