Defining Functions of Danish Political Commentary

Mette Bengtsson, Mary L. Kahl

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In Denmark political commentary is still a relatively new phenomenon. This paper analyzes the metadiscourse in relation to political commentary to identify the different understandings that have coalesced around political commentary as a genre. I argue that people in different positions (e.g. citizens, politicians, journalists, political editors, chief editors and political commentators themselves) emphasize different explanations for the rise of the genre and thereby functions of political commentary as part of an argumentative strategy favouring their own interests
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationArgumentation: Cognition and Community : Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA)
EditorsFrank Zenker
Number of pages8
PublisherBepress
Publication date2011
Pages1-8
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
EventOntario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference: Argumentation: Cognition & Community - University of Windsor, Windsor, United Kingdom
Duration: 8 May 201121 May 2011
https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA9/

Conference

ConferenceOntario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference
LocationUniversity of Windsor
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityWindsor
Period08/05/201121/05/2011
Internet address

Keywords

  • Faculty of Humanities
  • pundit
  • public debate
  • democracy
  • persuasion
  • rhetoric
  • genre
  • function
  • political commentator

Cite this