Abstract
This article analyses the production and reproduction of traditional chieftaincy in war-torn eastern DR Congo, through the case of a succession dispute in Kalima (South Kivu). Kalima has gone through two decades of political instability and violent conflict involving a plethora of local, national and regional actors. During this period of uncertainty and upheaval, the institution of traditional chieftaincy has remained politically salient. We argue, that this salience is conditioned by a widespread belief in the authenticity and sacredness of the institution of traditional chieftaincy and by the ethno-territorial imaginary of the Congolese political order. Both of these are historically produced through rituals, ceremonies and narratives of origin. They imbue the institution of traditional chieftaincy with charisma and enable customary chiefs to accumulate resources and exercise authority in a wide range of domains of public life in rural eastern Congo. Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu, we call this ability to rule through the notion of ‘custom’, customary capital. However, we also show that ‘customary capital’ does not automatically accrue to chiefs as a variety of internal and external actors vie for customary capital. As such it fluctuates over time as different actors move in and out of the capacity to legitimately wield customary capital.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Eastern African Studies |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 125-144 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| ISSN | 1753-1055 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jan 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work has been funded by a joint PhD grant from Roskilde University and the Danish Institute for International Studies, the Department for International Development (DFID) [Conflict Research Programme], and the European Research Council (ERC) [Ares (2015) 2785650-ERC-2014-AdG-662770-Local State]. The authors would like to thank their collaborators in the Congo, notably Fidèle Changamba, Vincent Kagale, Vincent Mukwege, Lebon Mulimbi, and Déo Buuma, who facilitated and supported the research. In addition we would to thank two anonymous reviewers and the participants in the ‘Rule and Rupture Summer Lab’ in Skagen in 2017, who provided constructive feedback on earlier drafts of this article. We would especially like to thanks Mattias Borg Rasmussen who provided detailed feedback. Last, but not least we would like to thank the guest editors of this special issue, Vicky van Bockhaven and Judith Verweijen, for their thorough feedback at different stages of the process.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords
- conflict
- customary capital
- DR Congo
- ethnicity
- field
- Traditional chieftaincy
Citation Styles
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver