Contending philosophy of social science perspectives: A flexible typology

Hubert Buch-Hansen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Philosophy of social science (PoS) typologies can help practitioners in the social sciences to reflect upon the often-tacit assumptions embedded in research. Existing PoS typologies however suffer from various shortcomings, one of them being a tendency to present extreme versions of the assumptions underpinning research. Having considered this and other shortcomings, the present paper advances a flexible PoS typology. Operating with strong and moderated versions of three PoS perspectives – positivism, constructionism and (critical) realism – the typology captures key assumptions underpinning a broad range of contemporary social research. Moreover, it opens up the possibility of contemplating the assumptions embedded in research in a more fruitful way. To render tangible how the typology constitutes an improvement over existing typologies, it is used in reflections on sustainability research on climate negotiations, green growth and housing development.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
Volume53
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)183-199
Number of pages17
ISSN0021-8308
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • constructionism
  • philosophy of science
  • positivism
  • realism
  • typologies

Cite this