Childhood immunization, vaccine hesitancy, and provaccination policy in high-income countries

Frej Klem Thomsen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Increasing vaccine hesitancy among parents in high-income countries and the resulting drop in early childhood immunization constitute an important public health problem, and raise the issue of what policies might be taken to promote higher rates of vaccination. This article first outlines the background of the problem of increasing vaccine hesitancy. It then explores the pros and cons of 3 types of policy: (a) interventions focused on increasing awareness of the benefits of vaccination while eliminating mistaken perceptions of risks, (b) “nudges,” which make certain choices more likely to be voluntarily chosen by manipulating the decision environment, and (c) policies that impose costs to make nonvaccination undesirable even for parents who are hesitant. It argues that a wide range of policies, including coercive policies, is desirable from a public health perspective, as the least intrusive policies alone are unlikely to achieve and sustain the important public good of herd immunity
Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Volume23
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)324-335
ISSN1076-8971
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Cite this

@article{fc9e7ec20c174f0c91b3cfa7920cc6f1,
title = "Childhood immunization, vaccine hesitancy, and provaccination policy in high-income countries",
abstract = "Increasing vaccine hesitancy among parents in high-income countries and the resulting drop in early childhood immunization constitute an important public health problem, and raise the issue of what policies might be taken to promote higher rates of vaccination. This article first outlines the background of the problem of increasing vaccine hesitancy. It then explores the pros and cons of 3 types of policy: (a) interventions focused on increasing awareness of the benefits of vaccination while eliminating mistaken perceptions of risks, (b) “nudges,” which make certain choices more likely to be voluntarily chosen by manipulating the decision environment, and (c) policies that impose costs to make nonvaccination undesirable even for parents who are hesitant. It argues that a wide range of policies, including coercive policies, is desirable from a public health perspective, as the least intrusive policies alone are unlikely to achieve and sustain the important public good of herd immunity",
author = "Thomsen, {Frej Klem}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1037/law0000126",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "324--335",
journal = "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law",
issn = "1076-8971",
number = "3",

}

Childhood immunization, vaccine hesitancy, and provaccination policy in high-income countries. / Thomsen, Frej Klem.

In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2017, p. 324-335.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Childhood immunization, vaccine hesitancy, and provaccination policy in high-income countries

AU - Thomsen, Frej Klem

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Increasing vaccine hesitancy among parents in high-income countries and the resulting drop in early childhood immunization constitute an important public health problem, and raise the issue of what policies might be taken to promote higher rates of vaccination. This article first outlines the background of the problem of increasing vaccine hesitancy. It then explores the pros and cons of 3 types of policy: (a) interventions focused on increasing awareness of the benefits of vaccination while eliminating mistaken perceptions of risks, (b) “nudges,” which make certain choices more likely to be voluntarily chosen by manipulating the decision environment, and (c) policies that impose costs to make nonvaccination undesirable even for parents who are hesitant. It argues that a wide range of policies, including coercive policies, is desirable from a public health perspective, as the least intrusive policies alone are unlikely to achieve and sustain the important public good of herd immunity

AB - Increasing vaccine hesitancy among parents in high-income countries and the resulting drop in early childhood immunization constitute an important public health problem, and raise the issue of what policies might be taken to promote higher rates of vaccination. This article first outlines the background of the problem of increasing vaccine hesitancy. It then explores the pros and cons of 3 types of policy: (a) interventions focused on increasing awareness of the benefits of vaccination while eliminating mistaken perceptions of risks, (b) “nudges,” which make certain choices more likely to be voluntarily chosen by manipulating the decision environment, and (c) policies that impose costs to make nonvaccination undesirable even for parents who are hesitant. It argues that a wide range of policies, including coercive policies, is desirable from a public health perspective, as the least intrusive policies alone are unlikely to achieve and sustain the important public good of herd immunity

U2 - 10.1037/law0000126

DO - 10.1037/law0000126

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 324

EP - 335

JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

SN - 1076-8971

IS - 3

ER -