Abstract
This article analyses the relationship between expert knowledge and political decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark, Greece and the United States. Due to the swift spread of the COVID-19 virus across the globe, the management of the pandemic required urgent government responses. Our empirical findings enabled us to identify a new typology of different types of advice, from naked power to technocracy, including in-between modes of networking and interactions. We also demonstrate how systemic and governance characteristics affect expert-politics responses in the three countries. The findings demonstrate similar responses in Greece and Denmark, by contrast with the United States. We conclude by proposing a new research agenda for expert-politician relations during crises, which focuses on the role of experts in public sensemaking, which is particularly important in an era of recurring and overlapping crises.
| Translated title of the contribution | Eksperter i politik i krisesituationer |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Journal | Policy and Politics |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 24-43 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| ISSN | 0305-5736 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 5 Jan 2024 |
Keywords
- experts
- expertise
- COVID-19
- crisis management
- politicisation
- Denmark
- Greece
- US
Citation Styles
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver