Abstract
Frontline workers’ behaviour is often guided by considerations of clients’ best interests (citizen-agent orientation) rather than strict policy adherence (state-agent orientation). Using a pre-registered 2 × 2 factorial vignette experiment involving caseworkers (n = 813) at Danish unemployment agencies, we present evidence on how priming a citizen-agent versus a state-agent orientation influences conduct towards clients – and whether these effects are moderated by clients expressing burdens with policy compliance. Our findings suggest that citizen-agent priming reduces the inclination to sanction noncompliant clients, regardless of expressed burdens, emphasizing how simple prompts can shift bureaucratic decision-making towards clients.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Public Management Review |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1087-1107 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| ISSN | 1471-9037 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2026 |
Keywords
- Administrative burdens
- Decision-making
- Street-level bureaucracy
Citation Styles
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver