Description
The Oslo Accords signed in 1993 were supposed to end in a final settlement of the Palestine- Israel conflict after an interim period of five years. That objective never materialised with the seven ‘permanent status’ issues yet to be negotiated. The Declaration of Principles (DOP) lists them in thefollowing order: (1) Jerusalem, (2) refugees, (3) settlements, (4) security arrangements, (5) borders, (6) relations and cooperation with other neighbours, and (7) other issues of common interest.
From the onset, it was clear that the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) and the State of Israel had two contradictory visions of the process. While the former envisaged an end to Israel’s settler colonialism, the latter saw it as an opportunity to create a system of indirect rule over the territories occupied in 1967.
Whereas there were 260,000 Israeli settlers in the West Bank and East Jerusalem in 1993; today they number more than 600,000. The obvious question, therefore, is that if Israel was really committed
to peace, why did it invest so heavily in the construction and maintenance of new settlements in the occupied territories.
In normal circumstances, where the rule of law is upheld and mediation was conducted in good faith, this situation could not have persisted. The Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 clearly prohibits countries from moving their population into territories occupied in war (Article 49).
Hence, it was inevitable that the disregard of international law in the Oslo process would lead to a dead end.
With its total control over all of historic Palestine and rejection of a Palestinian state in the territories occupied in 1967, Israel has created an apartheid reality in which two peoples occupy the same land but with one people, Israelis, totally dominating the other, Palestinians. The latter are completely surrounded by walls and checkpoints, trapped within fragmented enclaves.
Indeed, to the same degree that the Palestinians did not achieve their independence and statehood, so too the Israelis have failed to realise their exclusive and democratic Jewish state, with a Jewish majority.
Period | 29 Sept 2018 |
---|---|
Event type | Conference |
Location | London, United KingdomShow on map |
Keywords
- Oslo accords
- Palestine
- Israel
- international law
- settler colonialism
- occupation
- apartheid
- peace
- war
- conflict
Documents & Links
Related content
-
Research output
-
The European Neighbourhood Policy and Islamist actors in the southern neighbourhood
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
-
Trauma, Emotions and Memory in World Politics: The Case of the European Union’s Foreign Policy in the Middle East Conflict
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
-
The Palestinian Authority in the West Bank: The Theatrics of Woeful Statecraft
Research output: Book/Report › Book › Research › peer-review
-
Political legitimacy and celebrity politicians: Tony Blair as Middle East envoy 2007-2015
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
-
Israel Fires But “Palestinian Claim to Citizenship Has Never Been Stronger”
Research output: Other contribution › Net publication - Internet publication › Research › peer-review
-
Norway's ambiguous approach towards Israel and Palestine: Forum: The occupation of Palestinian territories since 1967: an analysis of Europe’s role
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
-
EU–Hamas actors in a state of permanent liminality
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
-
Projects