The mountain of criticisms leveled against the microfinance project is largely founded on the claim that microfinance institutions (MFIs) are unethically making egregious profits from the sweats and in the name of poor people. Both the pro and critical literature unanimously point to the fact that the industry is financially viable – they only part ways on who benefits from the profit. The taken position of this study to investigate what drives commercial MFIs into bankruptcy therefore clearly contradicts received wisdom. How could institutions seen as making profits (critics even say excessively) be at the same time running to Chapter 11? Is it the case that the MFIs do not experience profit as claimed? Could it be commercialization sowing its own seed of destruction? Or it is about management and governance and/or different factors including regulation?
|Uddannelser||Internationale Udviklingsstudier, (Bachelor/kandidatuddannelse) Kandidat|
|Udgivelsesdato||29 jun. 2015|
- Commercialization, self-sustainability
- Bankrutpcy, Microfinance