This project examines the frames related to gender in the coverage of the so called “submarine case”. This project contains an analysis of a week of the coverage in the three Danish newspapers, Kristeligt Dagblad, Politiken and Ekstra Bladet. They represent three very different styles within Danish newspapers and the way they cover the submarine case is also different in many ways. It is found that Kristeligt Dagblad prioritises the case below many other news stories while Ekstra Bladet and Politiken have an extensive coverage - however a coverage with different focuses. Ekstra Bladet is focused on Peter Madsen while Politiken focuses on the victim, Kim Wall. Although the newspapers have different ways of covering the case, “victim blaming” frames are found throughout all three papers. In one instance a slight, explicit glorification on Peter Madsen is found, and all papers use positive categorizations of Peter Madsen such as “inventor” and “captain”.
|Uddannelser||Journalistik, (Bachelor/kandidatuddannelse) Kandidat|
|Udgivelsesdato||7 jun. 2007|