Whole-of-Government Approaches to Fragile States in Africa

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

For a number of years fragile states have been high on the foreign policy agendas of the USA and the EU. Both actors look upon fragile states with great concern and consider them as security threats. Officially they give priority to ‘whole-of-government approaches’ (wga) when addressing the threats from these states. However, there is a gap between the policy declarations and the policies implemented by the two actors. The missing link in the implementation of wga in Africa is explained by two variables: on the one hand, material interests in the continent and, on the other hand, the institutions in Washington and Brussels involved in policy making. It is the lack of a strong foreign policy priority for Africa that explains the inadequate US implementation of wga. In the case of the EU, it is the multitude of institutions and institutional interests that explains the lack of implementation, rather than a lack of European interests in the fragile states on continent.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThird World Quarterly
Vol/bind34
Udgave nummer10
Sider (fra-til)1828-1842
ISSN0143-6597
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2013

Citer dette

@article{177f5736e8ed4a1d83a95022c0b07c5c,
title = "Whole-of-Government Approaches to Fragile States in Africa",
abstract = "For a number of years fragile states have been high on the foreign policy agendas of the USA and the EU. Both actors look upon fragile states with great concern and consider them as security threats. Officially they give priority to ‘whole-of-government approaches’ (wga) when addressing the threats from these states. However, there is a gap between the policy declarations and the policies implemented by the two actors. The missing link in the implementation of wga in Africa is explained by two variables: on the one hand, material interests in the continent and, on the other hand, the institutions in Washington and Brussels involved in policy making. It is the lack of a strong foreign policy priority for Africa that explains the inadequate US implementation of wga. In the case of the EU, it is the multitude of institutions and institutional interests that explains the lack of implementation, rather than a lack of European interests in the fragile states on continent.",
author = "Olsen, {Gorm Rye}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/01436597.2013.851898",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1828--1842",
journal = "Third World Quarterly",
issn = "0143-6597",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "10",

}

Whole-of-Government Approaches to Fragile States in Africa. / Olsen, Gorm Rye.

I: Third World Quarterly, Bind 34, Nr. 10, 2013, s. 1828-1842.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Whole-of-Government Approaches to Fragile States in Africa

AU - Olsen, Gorm Rye

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - For a number of years fragile states have been high on the foreign policy agendas of the USA and the EU. Both actors look upon fragile states with great concern and consider them as security threats. Officially they give priority to ‘whole-of-government approaches’ (wga) when addressing the threats from these states. However, there is a gap between the policy declarations and the policies implemented by the two actors. The missing link in the implementation of wga in Africa is explained by two variables: on the one hand, material interests in the continent and, on the other hand, the institutions in Washington and Brussels involved in policy making. It is the lack of a strong foreign policy priority for Africa that explains the inadequate US implementation of wga. In the case of the EU, it is the multitude of institutions and institutional interests that explains the lack of implementation, rather than a lack of European interests in the fragile states on continent.

AB - For a number of years fragile states have been high on the foreign policy agendas of the USA and the EU. Both actors look upon fragile states with great concern and consider them as security threats. Officially they give priority to ‘whole-of-government approaches’ (wga) when addressing the threats from these states. However, there is a gap between the policy declarations and the policies implemented by the two actors. The missing link in the implementation of wga in Africa is explained by two variables: on the one hand, material interests in the continent and, on the other hand, the institutions in Washington and Brussels involved in policy making. It is the lack of a strong foreign policy priority for Africa that explains the inadequate US implementation of wga. In the case of the EU, it is the multitude of institutions and institutional interests that explains the lack of implementation, rather than a lack of European interests in the fragile states on continent.

U2 - 10.1080/01436597.2013.851898

DO - 10.1080/01436597.2013.851898

M3 - Journal article

VL - 34

SP - 1828

EP - 1842

JO - Third World Quarterly

JF - Third World Quarterly

SN - 0143-6597

IS - 10

ER -