Who do We Think We (and They) Are? The Audience and the Researcher as Participants in Sociomaterial Practice

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

The article problematizes the ontological and epistemological separation of the audience researcher from the very audience the researcher wishes to investigate. After all, every researcher co-constitutes the research outcome, and every researcher can potentially be articulated also as audience participant. The text consequently suggests conceptualizing the researcher as well as the researched as participants in and contributors to sociomaterial practice by building on insights from Critical Psychology. Thinking audience research in the light of such an understanding challenges widely accepted divisions between those who do research and those who are being researched, as well as between theoretical and empirical work, between qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Finally it is argued that the researcher's perspective on the sociomaterial relations of concern is necessarily situated and limited. Hence, engaging in audience research as social research calls for investigating other practice participants' perspectives on these relations so as to collaborate on tackling problems of shared concern.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCommunication Review
Vol/bind16
Udgave nummer1-2
Sider (fra-til)81-91
ISSN1071-4421
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 14 mar. 2013

Citer dette

@article{39dce1bc7b114924989ba6945a702976,
title = "Who do We Think We (and They) Are?: The Audience and the Researcher as Participants in Sociomaterial Practice",
abstract = "The article problematizes the ontological and epistemological separation of the audience researcher from the very audience the researcher wishes to investigate. After all, every researcher co-constitutes the research outcome, and every researcher can potentially be articulated also as audience participant. The text consequently suggests conceptualizing the researcher as well as the researched as participants in and contributors to sociomaterial practice by building on insights from Critical Psychology. Thinking audience research in the light of such an understanding challenges widely accepted divisions between those who do research and those who are being researched, as well as between theoretical and empirical work, between qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Finally it is argued that the researcher's perspective on the sociomaterial relations of concern is necessarily situated and limited. Hence, engaging in audience research as social research calls for investigating other practice participants' perspectives on these relations so as to collaborate on tackling problems of shared concern.",
author = "Chimirri, {Niklas Alexander}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1080/10714421.2013.757505",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "81--91",
journal = "Communication Review",
issn = "1071-4421",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1-2",

}

Who do We Think We (and They) Are? The Audience and the Researcher as Participants in Sociomaterial Practice. / Chimirri, Niklas Alexander.

I: Communication Review, Bind 16, Nr. 1-2, 14.03.2013, s. 81-91.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who do We Think We (and They) Are?

T2 - The Audience and the Researcher as Participants in Sociomaterial Practice

AU - Chimirri, Niklas Alexander

PY - 2013/3/14

Y1 - 2013/3/14

N2 - The article problematizes the ontological and epistemological separation of the audience researcher from the very audience the researcher wishes to investigate. After all, every researcher co-constitutes the research outcome, and every researcher can potentially be articulated also as audience participant. The text consequently suggests conceptualizing the researcher as well as the researched as participants in and contributors to sociomaterial practice by building on insights from Critical Psychology. Thinking audience research in the light of such an understanding challenges widely accepted divisions between those who do research and those who are being researched, as well as between theoretical and empirical work, between qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Finally it is argued that the researcher's perspective on the sociomaterial relations of concern is necessarily situated and limited. Hence, engaging in audience research as social research calls for investigating other practice participants' perspectives on these relations so as to collaborate on tackling problems of shared concern.

AB - The article problematizes the ontological and epistemological separation of the audience researcher from the very audience the researcher wishes to investigate. After all, every researcher co-constitutes the research outcome, and every researcher can potentially be articulated also as audience participant. The text consequently suggests conceptualizing the researcher as well as the researched as participants in and contributors to sociomaterial practice by building on insights from Critical Psychology. Thinking audience research in the light of such an understanding challenges widely accepted divisions between those who do research and those who are being researched, as well as between theoretical and empirical work, between qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Finally it is argued that the researcher's perspective on the sociomaterial relations of concern is necessarily situated and limited. Hence, engaging in audience research as social research calls for investigating other practice participants' perspectives on these relations so as to collaborate on tackling problems of shared concern.

U2 - 10.1080/10714421.2013.757505

DO - 10.1080/10714421.2013.757505

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 81

EP - 91

JO - Communication Review

JF - Communication Review

SN - 1071-4421

IS - 1-2

ER -