Who Can I Blame?

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

Resumé

The paper addresses the case when one’s self proves itself to be a hindrance in performing certain actions successfully if their validity hinges on the acknowledgement of others, thus seemingly limiting the scope of one’s autonomy. Picking out our practice of blaming, it is argued that this practice is shaped by the view that, metaphorically speaking, a person with a beam in her own eye is in no position to complain about the mote in the eye of another. Such a complaint would involve a distinctive kind of incoherence (one that can also be found in relation to praise). This incoherence has received little attention from moral philosophers, but incoherent blame and praise may be inappropriate for two rather different reasons. First, they might involve the non-moral inappropriateness of incoherent applications of the standards appealed to. This form of inappropriateness can occur outside morality and is not distinctively moral in nature. Second, incoherent blame and praise are often morally inappropriate because they demean others in that the incoherent appraiser elevates herself above her blamee (praisee) by presenting the latter in an unwarrantedly negative light, comparatively speaking. The first kind of inappropriateness does not explain the second.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelAutonomy and the Self
RedaktørerMichael Kühler, Nadja Jelinek
Udgivelses stedDordrecht, London
ForlagSpringer
Publikationsdato2013
Sider295-315
ISBN (Trykt)978-94-007-4788-3
ISBN (Elektronisk)978-94-007-4789-0
StatusUdgivet - 2013
NavnPhilosophical Studies Series
Vol/bind118
ISSN0921-8599

Citer dette

Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2013). Who Can I Blame? I M. Kühler, & N. Jelinek (red.), Autonomy and the Self (s. 295-315). Dordrecht, London: Springer. Philosophical Studies Series, Bind. 118
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. / Who Can I Blame?. Autonomy and the Self. red. / Michael Kühler ; Nadja Jelinek. Dordrecht, London : Springer, 2013. s. 295-315 (Philosophical Studies Series, Bind 118).
@inbook{d255ce2868bc4efa92fd07f821c4664c,
title = "Who Can I Blame?",
abstract = "The paper addresses the case when one’s self proves itself to be a hindrance in performing certain actions successfully if their validity hinges on the acknowledgement of others, thus seemingly limiting the scope of one’s autonomy. Picking out our practice of blaming, it is argued that this practice is shaped by the view that, metaphorically speaking, a person with a beam in her own eye is in no position to complain about the mote in the eye of another. Such a complaint would involve a distinctive kind of incoherence (one that can also be found in relation to praise). This incoherence has received little attention from moral philosophers, but incoherent blame and praise may be inappropriate for two rather different reasons. First, they might involve the non-moral inappropriateness of incoherent applications of the standards appealed to. This form of inappropriateness can occur outside morality and is not distinctively moral in nature. Second, incoherent blame and praise are often morally inappropriate because they demean others in that the incoherent appraiser elevates herself above her blamee (praisee) by presenting the latter in an unwarrantedly negative light, comparatively speaking. The first kind of inappropriateness does not explain the second.",
author = "Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-94-007-4788-3",
pages = "295--315",
editor = "Michael K{\"u}hler and Nadja Jelinek",
booktitle = "Autonomy and the Self",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Lippert-Rasmussen, K 2013, Who Can I Blame? i M Kühler & N Jelinek (red), Autonomy and the Self. Springer, Dordrecht, London, Philosophical Studies Series, bind 118, s. 295-315.

Who Can I Blame? / Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper.

Autonomy and the Self. red. / Michael Kühler; Nadja Jelinek. Dordrecht, London : Springer, 2013. s. 295-315 (Philosophical Studies Series, Bind 118).

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Who Can I Blame?

AU - Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The paper addresses the case when one’s self proves itself to be a hindrance in performing certain actions successfully if their validity hinges on the acknowledgement of others, thus seemingly limiting the scope of one’s autonomy. Picking out our practice of blaming, it is argued that this practice is shaped by the view that, metaphorically speaking, a person with a beam in her own eye is in no position to complain about the mote in the eye of another. Such a complaint would involve a distinctive kind of incoherence (one that can also be found in relation to praise). This incoherence has received little attention from moral philosophers, but incoherent blame and praise may be inappropriate for two rather different reasons. First, they might involve the non-moral inappropriateness of incoherent applications of the standards appealed to. This form of inappropriateness can occur outside morality and is not distinctively moral in nature. Second, incoherent blame and praise are often morally inappropriate because they demean others in that the incoherent appraiser elevates herself above her blamee (praisee) by presenting the latter in an unwarrantedly negative light, comparatively speaking. The first kind of inappropriateness does not explain the second.

AB - The paper addresses the case when one’s self proves itself to be a hindrance in performing certain actions successfully if their validity hinges on the acknowledgement of others, thus seemingly limiting the scope of one’s autonomy. Picking out our practice of blaming, it is argued that this practice is shaped by the view that, metaphorically speaking, a person with a beam in her own eye is in no position to complain about the mote in the eye of another. Such a complaint would involve a distinctive kind of incoherence (one that can also be found in relation to praise). This incoherence has received little attention from moral philosophers, but incoherent blame and praise may be inappropriate for two rather different reasons. First, they might involve the non-moral inappropriateness of incoherent applications of the standards appealed to. This form of inappropriateness can occur outside morality and is not distinctively moral in nature. Second, incoherent blame and praise are often morally inappropriate because they demean others in that the incoherent appraiser elevates herself above her blamee (praisee) by presenting the latter in an unwarrantedly negative light, comparatively speaking. The first kind of inappropriateness does not explain the second.

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-94-007-4788-3

SP - 295

EP - 315

BT - Autonomy and the Self

A2 - Kühler, Michael

A2 - Jelinek, Nadja

PB - Springer

CY - Dordrecht, London

ER -

Lippert-Rasmussen K. Who Can I Blame? I Kühler M, Jelinek N, red., Autonomy and the Self. Dordrecht, London: Springer. 2013. s. 295-315. (Philosophical Studies Series, Bind 118).