When Liminals Interact

EU-Hamas Relations

Michelle Pace, Polly Pallister-Wilkins

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article engages with the concept of liminality by focusing on two, theoretically and empirically dubious categories: the EU and Hamas. Theoretically, both are in-between the traditional categories we use to make sense of the world and as such they challenge state-based, Westphalian, Eurocentric categories that dominate International Relations (IR). By analysing Hamas and the EU as liminals this article demonstrates how far certain collective discourses and non-state identities can go in challenging pre-existing categories on which the social order of international relations relies. Hamas does not ‘fit’ into pre-existing social categories of the social order in world politics. The EU does not fit into the system of states in international relations, although it attempts, in part, to behave like one at a supranational level. Empirically, both the EU and Hamas are able to exercise power to differing degrees depending on context. Both engage in politics on a procedural, day-to-day level that has significant consequences for their knowledge of themselves and the Other. This article explores how the liminal identity of these two actors impacts on their relations with each other and importantly their relations of Self. In exploring the procedural relations of the EU and Hamas it argues for the necessity of recognising liminal categories in IR theory and practice while at the same time highlighting the limits of such in-between categories in a world order still structured around the state
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2014
Antal sider30
StatusUdgivet - 2014
BegivenhedACCESS Europe workshop : The European Union and the Arab Spring: Constructions - University of Amsterdam, Allard Pierson Museum, Amsterdam, Holland
Varighed: 13 nov. 201414 nov. 2014
http://www.accesseurope.org/agenda/content/workshops/2014/11/workshop-eu-arab-spring.html

Workshop

WorkshopACCESS Europe workshop
LokationUniversity of Amsterdam, Allard Pierson Museum
LandHolland
ByAmsterdam
Periode13/11/201414/11/2014
Internetadresse

Emneord

  • liminality
  • European Union
  • Hamas
  • identity politics
  • International Relations
  • security
  • political movements
  • Arab countries

Citer dette

Pace, M., & Pallister-Wilkins, P. (2014). When Liminals Interact: EU-Hamas Relations. Afhandling præsenteret på ACCESS Europe workshop , Amsterdam, Holland.
Pace, Michelle ; Pallister-Wilkins, Polly. / When Liminals Interact : EU-Hamas Relations. Afhandling præsenteret på ACCESS Europe workshop , Amsterdam, Holland.30 s.
@conference{02e2bcbaf906488f98c8e38fca6a0af9,
title = "When Liminals Interact: EU-Hamas Relations",
abstract = "This article engages with the concept of liminality by focusing on two, theoretically and empirically dubious categories: the EU and Hamas. Theoretically, both are in-between the traditional categories we use to make sense of the world and as such they challenge state-based, Westphalian, Eurocentric categories that dominate International Relations (IR). By analysing Hamas and the EU as liminals this article demonstrates how far certain collective discourses and non-state identities can go in challenging pre-existing categories on which the social order of international relations relies. Hamas does not ‘fit’ into pre-existing social categories of the social order in world politics. The EU does not fit into the system of states in international relations, although it attempts, in part, to behave like one at a supranational level. Empirically, both the EU and Hamas are able to exercise power to differing degrees depending on context. Both engage in politics on a procedural, day-to-day level that has significant consequences for their knowledge of themselves and the Other. This article explores how the liminal identity of these two actors impacts on their relations with each other and importantly their relations of Self. In exploring the procedural relations of the EU and Hamas it argues for the necessity of recognising liminal categories in IR theory and practice while at the same time highlighting the limits of such in-between categories in a world order still structured around the state.",
keywords = "liminality, European Union, Hamas, identity politics, International Relations, security, political movements, Arab countries, liminality, European Union, Hamas, identity politics, International Relations, security, political movements, Arab countries",
author = "Michelle Pace and Polly Pallister-Wilkins",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
note = "ACCESS Europe workshop : The European Union and the Arab Spring: Constructions of Security in the Southern Mediterranean ; Conference date: 13-11-2014 Through 14-11-2014",
url = "http://www.accesseurope.org/agenda/content/workshops/2014/11/workshop-eu-arab-spring.html",

}

Pace, M & Pallister-Wilkins, P 2014, 'When Liminals Interact: EU-Hamas Relations' Paper fremlagt ved ACCESS Europe workshop , Amsterdam, Holland, 13/11/2014 - 14/11/2014, .

When Liminals Interact : EU-Hamas Relations. / Pace, Michelle; Pallister-Wilkins, Polly.

2014. Afhandling præsenteret på ACCESS Europe workshop , Amsterdam, Holland.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

TY - CONF

T1 - When Liminals Interact

T2 - EU-Hamas Relations

AU - Pace, Michelle

AU - Pallister-Wilkins, Polly

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This article engages with the concept of liminality by focusing on two, theoretically and empirically dubious categories: the EU and Hamas. Theoretically, both are in-between the traditional categories we use to make sense of the world and as such they challenge state-based, Westphalian, Eurocentric categories that dominate International Relations (IR). By analysing Hamas and the EU as liminals this article demonstrates how far certain collective discourses and non-state identities can go in challenging pre-existing categories on which the social order of international relations relies. Hamas does not ‘fit’ into pre-existing social categories of the social order in world politics. The EU does not fit into the system of states in international relations, although it attempts, in part, to behave like one at a supranational level. Empirically, both the EU and Hamas are able to exercise power to differing degrees depending on context. Both engage in politics on a procedural, day-to-day level that has significant consequences for their knowledge of themselves and the Other. This article explores how the liminal identity of these two actors impacts on their relations with each other and importantly their relations of Self. In exploring the procedural relations of the EU and Hamas it argues for the necessity of recognising liminal categories in IR theory and practice while at the same time highlighting the limits of such in-between categories in a world order still structured around the state.

AB - This article engages with the concept of liminality by focusing on two, theoretically and empirically dubious categories: the EU and Hamas. Theoretically, both are in-between the traditional categories we use to make sense of the world and as such they challenge state-based, Westphalian, Eurocentric categories that dominate International Relations (IR). By analysing Hamas and the EU as liminals this article demonstrates how far certain collective discourses and non-state identities can go in challenging pre-existing categories on which the social order of international relations relies. Hamas does not ‘fit’ into pre-existing social categories of the social order in world politics. The EU does not fit into the system of states in international relations, although it attempts, in part, to behave like one at a supranational level. Empirically, both the EU and Hamas are able to exercise power to differing degrees depending on context. Both engage in politics on a procedural, day-to-day level that has significant consequences for their knowledge of themselves and the Other. This article explores how the liminal identity of these two actors impacts on their relations with each other and importantly their relations of Self. In exploring the procedural relations of the EU and Hamas it argues for the necessity of recognising liminal categories in IR theory and practice while at the same time highlighting the limits of such in-between categories in a world order still structured around the state.

KW - liminality

KW - European Union

KW - Hamas

KW - identity politics

KW - International Relations

KW - security

KW - political movements

KW - Arab countries

KW - liminality

KW - European Union

KW - Hamas

KW - identity politics

KW - International Relations

KW - security

KW - political movements

KW - Arab countries

M3 - Paper

ER -

Pace M, Pallister-Wilkins P. When Liminals Interact: EU-Hamas Relations. 2014. Afhandling præsenteret på ACCESS Europe workshop , Amsterdam, Holland.