When Liminals Interact: EU-Hamas Relations

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article engages with the concept of liminality by focusing on two, theoretically and empirically dubious categories: the EU and Hamas. Theoretically, both are in-between the traditional categories we use to make sense of the world and as such they challenge state-based, Westphalian, Eurocentric categories that dominate International Relations (IR). By analysing Hamas and the EU as liminals this article demonstrates how far certain collective discourses and non-state identities can go in challenging pre-existing categories on which the social order of international relations relies. Hamas does not ‘fit’ into pre-existing social categories of the social order in world politics. The EU does not fit into the system of states in international relations, although it attempts, in part, to behave like one at a supranational level. Empirically, both the EU and Hamas are able to exercise power to differing degrees depending on context. Both engage in politics on a procedural, day-to-day level that has significant consequences for their knowledge of themselves and the Other. This article explores how the liminal identity of these two actors impacts on their relations with each other and importantly their relations of Self. In exploring the procedural relations of the EU and Hamas it argues for the necessity of recognising liminal categories in IR theory and practice while at the same time highlighting the limits of such in-between categories in a world order still structured around the state.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2016
Antal sider30
StatusUdgivet - 2016
BegivenhedSchool of Politics and International Relations Research Seminar : University of Kent, SPIRRS Research Seminar Programme Autumn 2014 - University of Kent, Canterbury West, Kent of Canterbury, Storbritannien
Varighed: 8 okt. 20148 okt. 2014
http://www.kent.ac.uk/calendar/?eid=8E81AF32-6266-41AA-A35C-0DAF86DD438A&view_by=day&date=20141008&category=&tag=

Seminar

SeminarSchool of Politics and International Relations Research Seminar
LokationUniversity of Kent, Canterbury West
LandStorbritannien
ByKent of Canterbury
Periode08/10/201408/10/2014
Internetadresse

Emneord

    Citer dette

    Pace, M. (2016). When Liminals Interact: EU-Hamas Relations. Afhandling præsenteret på School of Politics and International Relations Research Seminar , Kent of Canterbury, Storbritannien.
    Pace, Michelle. / When Liminals Interact : EU-Hamas Relations. Afhandling præsenteret på School of Politics and International Relations Research Seminar , Kent of Canterbury, Storbritannien.30 s.
    @conference{c578bdb10ffe4b34805712833c8e21d1,
    title = "When Liminals Interact: EU-Hamas Relations",
    abstract = "This article engages with the concept of liminality by focusing on two, theoretically and empirically dubious categories: the EU and Hamas. Theoretically, both are in-between the traditional categories we use to make sense of the world and as such they challenge state-based, Westphalian, Eurocentric categories that dominate International Relations (IR). By analysing Hamas and the EU as liminals this article demonstrates how far certain collective discourses and non-state identities can go in challenging pre-existing categories on which the social order of international relations relies. Hamas does not ‘fit’ into pre-existing social categories of the social order in world politics. The EU does not fit into the system of states in international relations, although it attempts, in part, to behave like one at a supranational level. Empirically, both the EU and Hamas are able to exercise power to differing degrees depending on context. Both engage in politics on a procedural, day-to-day level that has significant consequences for their knowledge of themselves and the Other. This article explores how the liminal identity of these two actors impacts on their relations with each other and importantly their relations of Self. In exploring the procedural relations of the EU and Hamas it argues for the necessity of recognising liminal categories in IR theory and practice while at the same time highlighting the limits of such in-between categories in a world order still structured around the state.",
    keywords = "Hamas, European Union, liminality",
    author = "Michelle Pace",
    note = "My paper discussant was: Professor Richard Whitman (Professor in Politics and International Relations); null : University of Kent, SPIRRS Research Seminar Programme Autumn 2014 ; Conference date: 08-10-2014 Through 08-10-2014",
    year = "2016",
    language = "English",
    url = "http://www.kent.ac.uk/calendar/?eid=8E81AF32-6266-41AA-A35C-0DAF86DD438A&view_by=day&date=20141008&category=&tag=",

    }

    Pace, M 2016, 'When Liminals Interact: EU-Hamas Relations' Paper fremlagt ved School of Politics and International Relations Research Seminar , Kent of Canterbury, Storbritannien, 08/10/2014 - 08/10/2014, .

    When Liminals Interact : EU-Hamas Relations. / Pace, Michelle.

    2016. Afhandling præsenteret på School of Politics and International Relations Research Seminar , Kent of Canterbury, Storbritannien.

    Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

    TY - CONF

    T1 - When Liminals Interact

    T2 - EU-Hamas Relations

    AU - Pace, Michelle

    N1 - My paper discussant was: Professor Richard Whitman (Professor in Politics and International Relations)

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - This article engages with the concept of liminality by focusing on two, theoretically and empirically dubious categories: the EU and Hamas. Theoretically, both are in-between the traditional categories we use to make sense of the world and as such they challenge state-based, Westphalian, Eurocentric categories that dominate International Relations (IR). By analysing Hamas and the EU as liminals this article demonstrates how far certain collective discourses and non-state identities can go in challenging pre-existing categories on which the social order of international relations relies. Hamas does not ‘fit’ into pre-existing social categories of the social order in world politics. The EU does not fit into the system of states in international relations, although it attempts, in part, to behave like one at a supranational level. Empirically, both the EU and Hamas are able to exercise power to differing degrees depending on context. Both engage in politics on a procedural, day-to-day level that has significant consequences for their knowledge of themselves and the Other. This article explores how the liminal identity of these two actors impacts on their relations with each other and importantly their relations of Self. In exploring the procedural relations of the EU and Hamas it argues for the necessity of recognising liminal categories in IR theory and practice while at the same time highlighting the limits of such in-between categories in a world order still structured around the state.

    AB - This article engages with the concept of liminality by focusing on two, theoretically and empirically dubious categories: the EU and Hamas. Theoretically, both are in-between the traditional categories we use to make sense of the world and as such they challenge state-based, Westphalian, Eurocentric categories that dominate International Relations (IR). By analysing Hamas and the EU as liminals this article demonstrates how far certain collective discourses and non-state identities can go in challenging pre-existing categories on which the social order of international relations relies. Hamas does not ‘fit’ into pre-existing social categories of the social order in world politics. The EU does not fit into the system of states in international relations, although it attempts, in part, to behave like one at a supranational level. Empirically, both the EU and Hamas are able to exercise power to differing degrees depending on context. Both engage in politics on a procedural, day-to-day level that has significant consequences for their knowledge of themselves and the Other. This article explores how the liminal identity of these two actors impacts on their relations with each other and importantly their relations of Self. In exploring the procedural relations of the EU and Hamas it argues for the necessity of recognising liminal categories in IR theory and practice while at the same time highlighting the limits of such in-between categories in a world order still structured around the state.

    KW - Hamas

    KW - European Union

    KW - liminality

    M3 - Paper

    ER -

    Pace M. When Liminals Interact: EU-Hamas Relations. 2016. Afhandling præsenteret på School of Politics and International Relations Research Seminar , Kent of Canterbury, Storbritannien.