What’s the problem with symbolic religious establishment? The alienation and symbolic equality accounts

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

Resumé

Debates about politics and religion in political philosophy have for a long time assumed that religious establishment is problematic. Only recently has political philosophers started to discuss this again. One result of these new discussions is a more nuanced conception of religious establishment showing that institutional links between state and organized religion can be ‘moderate’ or ‘modest’. Such forms of establishment are mostly symbolic, respect freedom of religion and do not involve forms of distributive injustice. It then becomes less clear whether and why such forms of religious establishment are problematic. In this paper I articulate and discuss two accounts sometimes invoked but not systematically formulated or discussed in the literature for why even symbolic forms of establishment are problematic, namely what I call the alienation account and the symbolic equality account. I argue that these two accounts are importantly different, since they have different implications and face different problems. The chapter articulates and explores the axiological assumptions and normative principles underlying the two accounts. This investigation raises a number of challenges that critics of religious establishment who premise their criticism on these accounts will have to deal with.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelReligion in Liberal Political Philosophy
RedaktørerCécile Laborde, Aurélia Bardon
Antal sider14
Udgivelses stedOxford
ForlagOxford University Press
Publikationsdatojun. 2017
Sider118-131
Kapitel8
ISBN (Trykt)9780198794394
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2017

Emneord

  • religion og politik
  • stat og kirke
  • religionsfrihed
  • Religionslighed
  • statskirke
  • folkekirke
  • Sekularisme

Citer dette

Lægaard, S. (2017). What’s the problem with symbolic religious establishment? The alienation and symbolic equality accounts. I C. Laborde, & A. Bardon (red.), Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy (s. 118-131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lægaard, Sune. / What’s the problem with symbolic religious establishment? The alienation and symbolic equality accounts. Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy. red. / Cécile Laborde ; Aurélia Bardon. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2017. s. 118-131
@inbook{38acdf3372b74fe1bac87b2c2544b009,
title = "What’s the problem with symbolic religious establishment? The alienation and symbolic equality accounts",
abstract = "In this chapter I examine two possible reasons, which are prominent butoften not systematically discussed in the literature, for thinking even purelysymbolic establishment problematic. These are considerations of alienationand symbolic equality. I am only concerned with ways in which establishmentmight be normatively problematic even if it does not infringe on religiousfreedom and does not involve material injustices in other respects.",
keywords = "religion og politik, stat og kirke, religionsfrihed, Religionslighed, statskirke, folkekirke, Sekularisme, religion, religion og politik, stat og kirke, Sekularisme, religionsfrihed",
author = "Sune L{\ae}gaard",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780198794394",
pages = "118--131",
editor = "C{\'e}cile Laborde and Aur{\'e}lia Bardon",
booktitle = "Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

Lægaard, S 2017, What’s the problem with symbolic religious establishment? The alienation and symbolic equality accounts. i C Laborde & A Bardon (red), Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, s. 118-131.

What’s the problem with symbolic religious establishment? The alienation and symbolic equality accounts. / Lægaard, Sune.

Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy. red. / Cécile Laborde; Aurélia Bardon. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2017. s. 118-131.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

TY - CHAP

T1 - What’s the problem with symbolic religious establishment? The alienation and symbolic equality accounts

AU - Lægaard, Sune

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - In this chapter I examine two possible reasons, which are prominent butoften not systematically discussed in the literature, for thinking even purelysymbolic establishment problematic. These are considerations of alienationand symbolic equality. I am only concerned with ways in which establishmentmight be normatively problematic even if it does not infringe on religiousfreedom and does not involve material injustices in other respects.

AB - In this chapter I examine two possible reasons, which are prominent butoften not systematically discussed in the literature, for thinking even purelysymbolic establishment problematic. These are considerations of alienationand symbolic equality. I am only concerned with ways in which establishmentmight be normatively problematic even if it does not infringe on religiousfreedom and does not involve material injustices in other respects.

KW - religion og politik

KW - stat og kirke

KW - religionsfrihed

KW - Religionslighed

KW - statskirke

KW - folkekirke

KW - Sekularisme

KW - religion

KW - religion og politik

KW - stat og kirke

KW - Sekularisme

KW - religionsfrihed

UR - https://global.oup.com/academic/product/religion-in-liberal-political-philosophy-9780198794394?q=cecile%20laborde&lang=en&cc=dk#

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9780198794394

SP - 118

EP - 131

BT - Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy

A2 - Laborde, Cécile

A2 - Bardon, Aurélia

PB - Oxford University Press

CY - Oxford

ER -

Lægaard S. What’s the problem with symbolic religious establishment? The alienation and symbolic equality accounts. I Laborde C, Bardon A, red., Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2017. s. 118-131