What influences cross-border acquisition performance?

A meta-analysis

Camilla Jensen, Peter Zamborsky, David R. King

Publikation: KonferencebidragKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskningpeer review

Resumé

We propose to contribute to two areas of the literature on meta-studies in international business and finance. Our first contribution is methodological, where we replicate and extend the study by Stahl and Voigt (2008) to aggregate additional research and variables to find the drivers of performance in cross-border acquisitions. This is accomplished through content analysis of existing research to aggregate research results by conducting meta-studies and potentially also expand its scientific domain. Additional methodological contributions of such meta-analysis could include: 1) helping to uncover entirely new findings from existing research, 2) examining complex non-linear models, and 3) easing the task of compiling the data to investigate larger and more diverse samples on their topic of interest. Second, we will apply recently developed techniques to compare drivers of cross-border acquisition performance to identify a set of the most influential factors. Using the validated prediction model on a new and expanded dataset from the first step, we will apply advanced analytical techniques to answer: What influences cross-border acquisition performance? A fundamental challenge of cross-border acquisitions involves cultural distance that reflects a combination displaying both a need for knowledge and barriers to obtaining it (Reus & Lamont, 2009; Stahl & Voigt, 2008). Cultural distance is often expected to have an overall negative effect on acquisition performance (e.g., Goerzen & Beamish, 2003; Hutzschenreuter, Voll & Verbeke, 2011; Stahl & Voigt, 2008). While research recognizes additional dimensions to cultural distance, involving language, geographic and institutional distance (Bauer et al., 2018; Coval & Moskowitz, 1999; Kedia & Reddy, 2016), research rarely examines different dimensions of cultural distance and how associated challenges can be mitigated (Risberg, 2001, Rottig, 2011). Using prediction algorithms (Shaikhina et al., 2017), we can compile studies with variables of interest on measures of performance and distance in cross-border acquisition research. Abstract Emneord
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato14 sep. 2018
StatusUdgivet - 14 sep. 2018
BegivenhedEconometric Research in Finance 2018 - Warsaw School of Economics (SGH), Warsaw, Polen
Varighed: 14 sep. 201814 sep. 2018
http://www.erfin.org

Workshop

WorkshopEconometric Research in Finance 2018
LokationWarsaw School of Economics (SGH)
LandPolen
ByWarsaw
Periode14/09/201814/09/2018
Internetadresse

Emneord

  • Meta-analysis
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Prediction modelling
  • Classifiers
  • Cultural distance
  • Research methods

Citer dette

Jensen, C., Zamborsky, P., & King, D. R. (2018). What influences cross-border acquisition performance? A meta-analysis. Abstract fra Econometric Research in Finance 2018, Warsaw, Polen.
Jensen, Camilla ; Zamborsky, Peter ; King, David R. / What influences cross-border acquisition performance? A meta-analysis. Abstract fra Econometric Research in Finance 2018, Warsaw, Polen.
@conference{25a1301833a541e4b16f771fc74f1d0d,
title = "What influences cross-border acquisition performance?: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "We propose to contribute to two areas of the literature on meta-studies in international business and finance. Our first contribution is methodological, where we replicate and extend the study by Stahl and Voigt (2008) to aggregate additional research and variables to find the drivers of performance in cross-border acquisitions. This is accomplished through content analysis of existing research to aggregate research results by conducting meta-studies and potentially also expand its scientific domain. Additional methodological contributions of such meta-analysis could include: 1) helping to uncover entirely new findings from existing research, 2) examining complex non-linear models, and 3) easing the task of compiling the data to investigate larger and more diverse samples on their topic of interest. Second, we will apply recently developed techniques to compare drivers of cross-border acquisition performance to identify a set of the most influential factors. Using the validated prediction model on a new and expanded dataset from the first step, we will apply advanced analytical techniques to answer: What influences cross-border acquisition performance? A fundamental challenge of cross-border acquisitions involves cultural distance that reflects a combination displaying both a need for knowledge and barriers to obtaining it (Reus & Lamont, 2009; Stahl & Voigt, 2008). Cultural distance is often expected to have an overall negative effect on acquisition performance (e.g., Goerzen & Beamish, 2003; Hutzschenreuter, Voll & Verbeke, 2011; Stahl & Voigt, 2008). While research recognizes additional dimensions to cultural distance, involving language, geographic and institutional distance (Bauer et al., 2018; Coval & Moskowitz, 1999; Kedia & Reddy, 2016), research rarely examines different dimensions of cultural distance and how associated challenges can be mitigated (Risberg, 2001, Rottig, 2011). Using prediction algorithms (Shaikhina et al., 2017), we can compile studies with variables of interest on measures of performance and distance in cross-border acquisition research.",
keywords = "Meta-analysis, Mergers & Acquisitions, Prediction modelling, Classifiers, Cultural distance, Research methods, Meta-analysis, Mergers & Acquisitions, Prediction modelling, Classifiers, Cultural distance, Research methods",
author = "Camilla Jensen and Peter Zamborsky and King, {David R.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "14",
language = "English",
note = "Econometric Research in Finance 2018, ERFIN 2018 ; Conference date: 14-09-2018 Through 14-09-2018",
url = "http://www.erfin.org",

}

Jensen, C, Zamborsky, P & King, DR 2018, 'What influences cross-border acquisition performance? A meta-analysis' Econometric Research in Finance 2018, Warsaw, Polen, 14/09/2018 - 14/09/2018, .

What influences cross-border acquisition performance? A meta-analysis. / Jensen, Camilla; Zamborsky, Peter; King, David R.

2018. Abstract fra Econometric Research in Finance 2018, Warsaw, Polen.

Publikation: KonferencebidragKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskningpeer review

TY - ABST

T1 - What influences cross-border acquisition performance?

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Jensen, Camilla

AU - Zamborsky, Peter

AU - King, David R.

PY - 2018/9/14

Y1 - 2018/9/14

N2 - We propose to contribute to two areas of the literature on meta-studies in international business and finance. Our first contribution is methodological, where we replicate and extend the study by Stahl and Voigt (2008) to aggregate additional research and variables to find the drivers of performance in cross-border acquisitions. This is accomplished through content analysis of existing research to aggregate research results by conducting meta-studies and potentially also expand its scientific domain. Additional methodological contributions of such meta-analysis could include: 1) helping to uncover entirely new findings from existing research, 2) examining complex non-linear models, and 3) easing the task of compiling the data to investigate larger and more diverse samples on their topic of interest. Second, we will apply recently developed techniques to compare drivers of cross-border acquisition performance to identify a set of the most influential factors. Using the validated prediction model on a new and expanded dataset from the first step, we will apply advanced analytical techniques to answer: What influences cross-border acquisition performance? A fundamental challenge of cross-border acquisitions involves cultural distance that reflects a combination displaying both a need for knowledge and barriers to obtaining it (Reus & Lamont, 2009; Stahl & Voigt, 2008). Cultural distance is often expected to have an overall negative effect on acquisition performance (e.g., Goerzen & Beamish, 2003; Hutzschenreuter, Voll & Verbeke, 2011; Stahl & Voigt, 2008). While research recognizes additional dimensions to cultural distance, involving language, geographic and institutional distance (Bauer et al., 2018; Coval & Moskowitz, 1999; Kedia & Reddy, 2016), research rarely examines different dimensions of cultural distance and how associated challenges can be mitigated (Risberg, 2001, Rottig, 2011). Using prediction algorithms (Shaikhina et al., 2017), we can compile studies with variables of interest on measures of performance and distance in cross-border acquisition research.

AB - We propose to contribute to two areas of the literature on meta-studies in international business and finance. Our first contribution is methodological, where we replicate and extend the study by Stahl and Voigt (2008) to aggregate additional research and variables to find the drivers of performance in cross-border acquisitions. This is accomplished through content analysis of existing research to aggregate research results by conducting meta-studies and potentially also expand its scientific domain. Additional methodological contributions of such meta-analysis could include: 1) helping to uncover entirely new findings from existing research, 2) examining complex non-linear models, and 3) easing the task of compiling the data to investigate larger and more diverse samples on their topic of interest. Second, we will apply recently developed techniques to compare drivers of cross-border acquisition performance to identify a set of the most influential factors. Using the validated prediction model on a new and expanded dataset from the first step, we will apply advanced analytical techniques to answer: What influences cross-border acquisition performance? A fundamental challenge of cross-border acquisitions involves cultural distance that reflects a combination displaying both a need for knowledge and barriers to obtaining it (Reus & Lamont, 2009; Stahl & Voigt, 2008). Cultural distance is often expected to have an overall negative effect on acquisition performance (e.g., Goerzen & Beamish, 2003; Hutzschenreuter, Voll & Verbeke, 2011; Stahl & Voigt, 2008). While research recognizes additional dimensions to cultural distance, involving language, geographic and institutional distance (Bauer et al., 2018; Coval & Moskowitz, 1999; Kedia & Reddy, 2016), research rarely examines different dimensions of cultural distance and how associated challenges can be mitigated (Risberg, 2001, Rottig, 2011). Using prediction algorithms (Shaikhina et al., 2017), we can compile studies with variables of interest on measures of performance and distance in cross-border acquisition research.

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Mergers & Acquisitions

KW - Prediction modelling

KW - Classifiers

KW - Cultural distance

KW - Research methods

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Mergers & Acquisitions

KW - Prediction modelling

KW - Classifiers

KW - Cultural distance

KW - Research methods

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

ER -

Jensen C, Zamborsky P, King DR. What influences cross-border acquisition performance? A meta-analysis. 2018. Abstract fra Econometric Research in Finance 2018, Warsaw, Polen.