What crisis of representation?: Challenging the neo-realism of poststructuralist policy research in Education

Eva Bendix Petersen

doi:10.1080/17508487.2015.983940

What crisis of representation? Challenging the neo-realism of poststructuralist policy research in Education

Eva Bendix Petersen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

17 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Offered through a split-text, this article mounts/destabilises the argument that policy research that cites authors usually associated with post-structural thought and which is published in a mainstream education policy journal is overwhelmingly realist in its ontologising practices. It reminds the reader why that is problematic and calls for a stronger post-realist praxis.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Critical Studies in Education
Vol/bind	56
Udgave nummer	1
Sider (fra-til)	147-160
ISSN	1750-8487
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.983940
Status	Udgivet - 2015

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1080/17508487.2015.983940

Citationsformater

@article{92b678a0479d4b259aed984d1b91d34d,

title = "What crisis of representation?: Challenging the neo-realism of poststructuralist policy research in Education",

abstract = "Offered through a split-text, this article mounts/destabilises the argument that policy research that cites authors usually associated with post-structural thought and which is published in a mainstream education policy journal is overwhelmingly realist in its ontologising practices. It reminds the reader why that is problematic and calls for a stronger post-realist praxis.",

author = "Petersen, \{Eva Bendix\}",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1080/17508487.2015.983940",

language = "English",

volume = "56",

pages = "147--160",

journal = "Critical Studies in Education",

issn = "1750-8487",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What crisis of representation?

T2 - Challenging the neo-realism of poststructuralist policy research in Education

AU - Petersen, Eva Bendix

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Offered through a split-text, this article mounts/destabilises the argument that policy research that cites authors usually associated with post-structural thought and which is published in a mainstream education policy journal is overwhelmingly realist in its ontologising practices. It reminds the reader why that is problematic and calls for a stronger post-realist praxis.

AB - Offered through a split-text, this article mounts/destabilises the argument that policy research that cites authors usually associated with post-structural thought and which is published in a mainstream education policy journal is overwhelmingly realist in its ontologising practices. It reminds the reader why that is problematic and calls for a stronger post-realist praxis.

U2 - 10.1080/17508487.2015.983940

DO - 10.1080/17508487.2015.983940

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1750-8487

VL - 56

SP - 147

EP - 160

JO - Critical Studies in Education

JF - Critical Studies in Education

IS - 1

ER -