Ways to remember disasters - inclusions, exclusions and hierarchies

Nina Blom Andersen

    Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferenceabstrakt i proceedingsForskning

    Resumé

    Title: Ways to remember disasters ? inclusions, exclusions and hierarchies

    Abstract:
    Some disasters are given much attention and get their own place in history. But how are these events remembered in society and why is it that some disasters are forgotten right away? These are the questions that this paper deals with.

    It will be argued, that there is a strong focus on the situation of citizens that suffers from, are affected or hurt by spectacular disasters. At least for a while after the event has taken place. The citizens get acknowledgement and eagerness to express care and support can be identified. There is especially focus on the psychological consequences and ways of dealing with traumas. This care and acknowledgement can on the one hand be seen as a strength, but the paper suggests, that it on the other hand can be seen as a weakness, that consequences of disasters primarily are understood as a burden for individuals instead of a collective and social problem. Disasters are remembered as events that affected and hurt a number of people, not as events that collective societal actors can learn from and work to prevent in the future.

    The paper further deals with the discussion why citizens affected or hurt from spectacular events only get their situation acknowledged in a certain period after an event has occurred and why the rest of society loose interest after a while. There can be a number of reasons for this, but the influence of a hierarchy of grief and affectedness is discussed in the paper. An investigation of such a hierarchy can also shed light to the question why some disasters get less or no attention, why they get excluded from the memory of society and are forgotten.

    The paper finally discusses the power to define whom to acknowledge, what to remember, what to forget and what to learn from a disaster.

    The analysis of the processes in relation to a technological disaster on Danish ground is based on both media texts and qualitative interviews.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TitelAbstract book, 9th Conference of European Sociological Association 2009
    ForlagEuropean Sociological Association
    Publikationsdato2009
    Sider1
    StatusUdgivet - 2009
    BegivenhedEuropean Society or European Societies? - Lissabon, Portugal
    Varighed: 2 sep. 20095 sep. 2009
    Konferencens nummer: 9th

    Konference

    KonferenceEuropean Society or European Societies?
    Nummer9th
    LandPortugal
    ByLissabon
    Periode02/09/200905/09/2009

    Bibliografisk note

    Udgivet på cd-rom

    Emneord

    • inklusion
    • eksklusion
    • ulykker
    • sorg hierarkier

    Citer dette

    Andersen, N. B. (2009). Ways to remember disasters - inclusions, exclusions and hierarchies. I Abstract book, 9th Conference of European Sociological Association 2009 (s. 1). European Sociological Association.
    Andersen, Nina Blom. / Ways to remember disasters - inclusions, exclusions and hierarchies. Abstract book, 9th Conference of European Sociological Association 2009. European Sociological Association, 2009. s. 1
    @inbook{ef8309c0010911dfb919000ea68e967b,
    title = "Ways to remember disasters - inclusions, exclusions and hierarchies",
    abstract = "Title: Ways to remember disasters ? inclusions, exclusions and hierarchiesAbstract: Some disasters are given much attention and get their own place in history. But how are these events remembered in society and why is it that some disasters are forgotten right away? These are the questions that this paper deals with.It will be argued, that there is a strong focus on the situation of citizens that suffers from, are affected or hurt by spectacular disasters. At least for a while after the event has taken place. The citizens get acknowledgement and eagerness to express care and support can be identified. There is especially focus on the psychological consequences and ways of dealing with traumas. This care and acknowledgement can on the one hand be seen as a strength, but the paper suggests, that it on the other hand can be seen as a weakness, that consequences of disasters primarily are understood as a burden for individuals instead of a collective and social problem. Disasters are remembered as events that affected and hurt a number of people, not as events that collective societal actors can learn from and work to prevent in the future.The paper further deals with the discussion why citizens affected or hurt from spectacular events only get their situation acknowledged in a certain period after an event has occurred and why the rest of society loose interest after a while. There can be a number of reasons for this, but the influence of a hierarchy of grief and affectedness is discussed in the paper. An investigation of such a hierarchy can also shed light to the question why some disasters get less or no attention, why they get excluded from the memory of society and are forgotten.The paper finally discusses the power to define whom to acknowledge, what to remember, what to forget and what to learn from a disaster. The analysis of the processes in relation to a technological disaster on Danish ground is based on both media texts and qualitative interviews.",
    keywords = "inklusion, eksklusion, ulykker, sorg hierarkier, inclusions, exclusions, disasters, hierarchies",
    author = "Andersen, {Nina Blom}",
    note = "Udgivet p{\aa} cd-rom",
    year = "2009",
    language = "English",
    pages = "1",
    booktitle = "Abstract book, 9th Conference of European Sociological Association 2009",
    publisher = "European Sociological Association",

    }

    Andersen, NB 2009, Ways to remember disasters - inclusions, exclusions and hierarchies. i Abstract book, 9th Conference of European Sociological Association 2009. European Sociological Association, s. 1, European Society or European Societies?, Lissabon, Portugal, 02/09/2009.

    Ways to remember disasters - inclusions, exclusions and hierarchies. / Andersen, Nina Blom.

    Abstract book, 9th Conference of European Sociological Association 2009. European Sociological Association, 2009. s. 1.

    Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferenceabstrakt i proceedingsForskning

    TY - ABST

    T1 - Ways to remember disasters - inclusions, exclusions and hierarchies

    AU - Andersen, Nina Blom

    N1 - Udgivet på cd-rom

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - Title: Ways to remember disasters ? inclusions, exclusions and hierarchiesAbstract: Some disasters are given much attention and get their own place in history. But how are these events remembered in society and why is it that some disasters are forgotten right away? These are the questions that this paper deals with.It will be argued, that there is a strong focus on the situation of citizens that suffers from, are affected or hurt by spectacular disasters. At least for a while after the event has taken place. The citizens get acknowledgement and eagerness to express care and support can be identified. There is especially focus on the psychological consequences and ways of dealing with traumas. This care and acknowledgement can on the one hand be seen as a strength, but the paper suggests, that it on the other hand can be seen as a weakness, that consequences of disasters primarily are understood as a burden for individuals instead of a collective and social problem. Disasters are remembered as events that affected and hurt a number of people, not as events that collective societal actors can learn from and work to prevent in the future.The paper further deals with the discussion why citizens affected or hurt from spectacular events only get their situation acknowledged in a certain period after an event has occurred and why the rest of society loose interest after a while. There can be a number of reasons for this, but the influence of a hierarchy of grief and affectedness is discussed in the paper. An investigation of such a hierarchy can also shed light to the question why some disasters get less or no attention, why they get excluded from the memory of society and are forgotten.The paper finally discusses the power to define whom to acknowledge, what to remember, what to forget and what to learn from a disaster. The analysis of the processes in relation to a technological disaster on Danish ground is based on both media texts and qualitative interviews.

    AB - Title: Ways to remember disasters ? inclusions, exclusions and hierarchiesAbstract: Some disasters are given much attention and get their own place in history. But how are these events remembered in society and why is it that some disasters are forgotten right away? These are the questions that this paper deals with.It will be argued, that there is a strong focus on the situation of citizens that suffers from, are affected or hurt by spectacular disasters. At least for a while after the event has taken place. The citizens get acknowledgement and eagerness to express care and support can be identified. There is especially focus on the psychological consequences and ways of dealing with traumas. This care and acknowledgement can on the one hand be seen as a strength, but the paper suggests, that it on the other hand can be seen as a weakness, that consequences of disasters primarily are understood as a burden for individuals instead of a collective and social problem. Disasters are remembered as events that affected and hurt a number of people, not as events that collective societal actors can learn from and work to prevent in the future.The paper further deals with the discussion why citizens affected or hurt from spectacular events only get their situation acknowledged in a certain period after an event has occurred and why the rest of society loose interest after a while. There can be a number of reasons for this, but the influence of a hierarchy of grief and affectedness is discussed in the paper. An investigation of such a hierarchy can also shed light to the question why some disasters get less or no attention, why they get excluded from the memory of society and are forgotten.The paper finally discusses the power to define whom to acknowledge, what to remember, what to forget and what to learn from a disaster. The analysis of the processes in relation to a technological disaster on Danish ground is based on both media texts and qualitative interviews.

    KW - inklusion

    KW - eksklusion

    KW - ulykker

    KW - sorg hierarkier

    KW - inclusions

    KW - exclusions

    KW - disasters

    KW - hierarchies

    M3 - Conference abstract in proceedings

    SP - 1

    BT - Abstract book, 9th Conference of European Sociological Association 2009

    PB - European Sociological Association

    ER -

    Andersen NB. Ways to remember disasters - inclusions, exclusions and hierarchies. I Abstract book, 9th Conference of European Sociological Association 2009. European Sociological Association. 2009. s. 1