'(World) risk society’ or ‘new rationalities of risk’?

A critical discussion of Ulrich Beck’s theory of reflexive modernity

Bidragets oversatte titel: '(Verdens)risikosamfund' eller 'nye risikorationaliteter'?: En kritisk diskussion af Ulrich Becks teori om refleksiv modernitet

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This paper calls attention to some basic problems and inner contradictions in the German sociologist Ulrich Beck’s theory of the ‘(world) risk society’ or reflexive (second) modernity. A main thread in the critique is that of addressing the theoretical ambiguities that seem to characterize Beck’s at the same time ‘social constructivist’ and ‘realist’ notion of risk; ambiguities that seem to be repeated on the one hand in Beck’s view on the relation between knowledge and unawareness in reflexive modernity and on the other hand in his view on the role of the mass media in the ‘(world) risk society’. Moreover, Beck’s notions of second modernity, reflexivity, rationality and critique are critically examined. With the alternative positions discussed in the paper – represented by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Niklas Luhmann and Mitchell Dean – some indications are given as to how one might fruitfully elaborate on the problem of risk. Thus, rather than a mainly technology-driven new type of social reality, the ‘(world) risk society’ could perhaps better be seen as indicating a changing cultural self-understanding of late modern society, a new ‘semantics of crisis’, or the emergence of new forms of governmentality in the contemporary welfare state. In conclusion some indications are given as to how an analysis of more specific ‘risk logics’ or ‘rationalities’ could be elaborated on, and a terminology that reflects this more differentiated approach to risk in late modern society is suggested.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThesis Eleven
Vol/bind108
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)3-25
Antal sider22
ISSN0725-5136
DOI
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2012

Emneord

  • culture of fear
  • governmentality
  • mass media
  • reflexive modernity
  • (world) risk society

Citer dette

@article{538ea09397434644a0110f4f2039ed65,
title = "'(World) risk society’ or ‘new rationalities of risk’?: A critical discussion of Ulrich Beck’s theory of reflexive modernity",
abstract = "This paper calls attention to some basic problems and inner contradictions in the German sociologist Ulrich Beck’s theory of the ‘(world) risk society’ or reflexive (second) modernity. A main thread in the critique is that of addressing the theoretical ambiguities that seem to characterize Beck’s at the same time ‘social constructivist’ and ‘realist’ notion of risk; ambiguities that seem to be repeated on the one hand in Beck’s view on the relation between knowledge and unawareness in reflexive modernity and on the other hand in his view on the role of the mass media in the ‘(world) risk society’. Moreover, Beck’s notions of second modernity, reflexivity, rationality and critique are critically examined. With the alternative positions discussed in the paper – represented by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Niklas Luhmann and Mitchell Dean – some indications are given as to how one might fruitfully elaborate on the problem of risk. Thus, rather than a mainly technology-driven new type of social reality, the ‘(world) risk society’ could perhaps better be seen as indicating a changing cultural self-understanding of late modern society, a new ‘semantics of crisis’, or the emergence of new forms of governmentality in the contemporary welfare state. In conclusion some indications are given as to how an analysis of more specific ‘risk logics’ or ‘rationalities’ could be elaborated on, and a terminology that reflects this more differentiated approach to risk in late modern society is suggested.",
keywords = "culture of fear, governmentality, mass media, reflexive modernity, (world) risk society, World risk society, reflexive modernity, governmentality, mass media, culture of fear",
author = "Klaus Rasborg",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/0725513611421479",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "3--25",
journal = "Thesis Eleven",
issn = "0725-5136",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

'(World) risk society’ or ‘new rationalities of risk’? A critical discussion of Ulrich Beck’s theory of reflexive modernity. / Rasborg, Klaus.

I: Thesis Eleven, Bind 108, Nr. 1, 02.2012, s. 3-25.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - '(World) risk society’ or ‘new rationalities of risk’?

T2 - A critical discussion of Ulrich Beck’s theory of reflexive modernity

AU - Rasborg, Klaus

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - This paper calls attention to some basic problems and inner contradictions in the German sociologist Ulrich Beck’s theory of the ‘(world) risk society’ or reflexive (second) modernity. A main thread in the critique is that of addressing the theoretical ambiguities that seem to characterize Beck’s at the same time ‘social constructivist’ and ‘realist’ notion of risk; ambiguities that seem to be repeated on the one hand in Beck’s view on the relation between knowledge and unawareness in reflexive modernity and on the other hand in his view on the role of the mass media in the ‘(world) risk society’. Moreover, Beck’s notions of second modernity, reflexivity, rationality and critique are critically examined. With the alternative positions discussed in the paper – represented by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Niklas Luhmann and Mitchell Dean – some indications are given as to how one might fruitfully elaborate on the problem of risk. Thus, rather than a mainly technology-driven new type of social reality, the ‘(world) risk society’ could perhaps better be seen as indicating a changing cultural self-understanding of late modern society, a new ‘semantics of crisis’, or the emergence of new forms of governmentality in the contemporary welfare state. In conclusion some indications are given as to how an analysis of more specific ‘risk logics’ or ‘rationalities’ could be elaborated on, and a terminology that reflects this more differentiated approach to risk in late modern society is suggested.

AB - This paper calls attention to some basic problems and inner contradictions in the German sociologist Ulrich Beck’s theory of the ‘(world) risk society’ or reflexive (second) modernity. A main thread in the critique is that of addressing the theoretical ambiguities that seem to characterize Beck’s at the same time ‘social constructivist’ and ‘realist’ notion of risk; ambiguities that seem to be repeated on the one hand in Beck’s view on the relation between knowledge and unawareness in reflexive modernity and on the other hand in his view on the role of the mass media in the ‘(world) risk society’. Moreover, Beck’s notions of second modernity, reflexivity, rationality and critique are critically examined. With the alternative positions discussed in the paper – represented by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Niklas Luhmann and Mitchell Dean – some indications are given as to how one might fruitfully elaborate on the problem of risk. Thus, rather than a mainly technology-driven new type of social reality, the ‘(world) risk society’ could perhaps better be seen as indicating a changing cultural self-understanding of late modern society, a new ‘semantics of crisis’, or the emergence of new forms of governmentality in the contemporary welfare state. In conclusion some indications are given as to how an analysis of more specific ‘risk logics’ or ‘rationalities’ could be elaborated on, and a terminology that reflects this more differentiated approach to risk in late modern society is suggested.

KW - culture of fear

KW - governmentality

KW - mass media

KW - reflexive modernity

KW - (world) risk society

KW - World risk society, reflexive modernity, governmentality, mass media, culture of fear

U2 - 10.1177/0725513611421479

DO - 10.1177/0725513611421479

M3 - Journal article

VL - 108

SP - 3

EP - 25

JO - Thesis Eleven

JF - Thesis Eleven

SN - 0725-5136

IS - 1

ER -