TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of the Early Functional Abilities scale
T2 - An assessment of four dimensions in early recovery after traumatic brain injury
AU - Poulsen, Ingrid
AU - Kreiner, Svend
AU - Engberg, Aase W
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Objective: The Early Functional Abilities scale assesses the restoration of brain function after brain injury, based on 4 dimensions. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the validity, objectivity, reliability and measurement precision of the Early Functional Abilities scale by Rasch model item analysis. A secondary objective was to examine the relationship between the Early Functional Abilities scale and the Functional Independence Measurement™, in order to establish the criterion validity of the Early Functional Abilities scale and to compare the sensitivity of measurements using the 2 instruments. Methods: The Rasch analysis was based on the assessment of 408 adult patients at admission to subacute rehabilitation in Copenhagen, Denmark after traumatic brain injury. Results: The Early Functional Abilities scale provides valid and objective measurement of vegetative (autonomic), facio-oral, sensorimotor and communicative/cognitive functions. Removal of one item from the sensorimotor scale confrmed unidimensionality for each of the 4 subscales, but not for the entire scale. The Early Functional Abilities subscales are sensitive to differences between patients in ranges in which the Functional Independence Measurement has a floor effect. Conclusion: The Early Functional Abilities scale assesses the early recovery of important aspects of brain function after traumatic brain injury, but is not unidimensional. We recommend removal of the "standing" item and calculation of summary subscales for the separate dimensions.
AB - Objective: The Early Functional Abilities scale assesses the restoration of brain function after brain injury, based on 4 dimensions. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the validity, objectivity, reliability and measurement precision of the Early Functional Abilities scale by Rasch model item analysis. A secondary objective was to examine the relationship between the Early Functional Abilities scale and the Functional Independence Measurement™, in order to establish the criterion validity of the Early Functional Abilities scale and to compare the sensitivity of measurements using the 2 instruments. Methods: The Rasch analysis was based on the assessment of 408 adult patients at admission to subacute rehabilitation in Copenhagen, Denmark after traumatic brain injury. Results: The Early Functional Abilities scale provides valid and objective measurement of vegetative (autonomic), facio-oral, sensorimotor and communicative/cognitive functions. Removal of one item from the sensorimotor scale confrmed unidimensionality for each of the 4 subscales, but not for the entire scale. The Early Functional Abilities subscales are sensitive to differences between patients in ranges in which the Functional Independence Measurement has a floor effect. Conclusion: The Early Functional Abilities scale assesses the early recovery of important aspects of brain function after traumatic brain injury, but is not unidimensional. We recommend removal of the "standing" item and calculation of summary subscales for the separate dimensions.
KW - Construct validity
KW - Early Functional Abilities
KW - Loglinear Rasch model
KW - Rasch model
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Traumatic brain injury
KW - Validation
U2 - 10.2340/16501977-2300
DO - 10.2340/16501977-2300
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 29313872
SN - 1650-1977
VL - 50
SP - 165
EP - 172
JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
JF - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
IS - 2
ER -