Unpacking the mechanisms of the EU ‘throughput’ governance legitimacy

the case of EFSA

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

The proliferation of EU agencies, referred to as agencification phenomenon, constitutes a significant EU institutional innovation. Agencification aimed to provide information, promote efficiency, decrease politicization and generate standards based on specialised technical knowledge. However, the expanded role of EU agencies in regulatory policymaking has raised legitimacy questions, particularly in times of crisis and scandals.
The legitimacy of agencies has been extensively studied with regard to input, and output (efficiency) legitimacy criteria. Instead, drawing on Schmidt’s (2013) work this article claims that in order to assess the overall legitimacy of the EU regulatory governance through agencies, the ‘throughput’ criterion needs to be considered. Although important, the ‘input’ (politics) and ‘output’ (policy) criteria fail to capture what happens within the actual governance (process), between the decisions and the outcomes. Examples from the EU food regulatory governance through the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), a particularly technical and scientific policy area, illustrate how the ‘throughput’ mechanisms operate. While the absence of one of the throughput mechanisms delegitimizes the regulatory governance of food, their simultaneous presence contributes to overall legitimacy of governance.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPerspectives on European Politics and Society
Vol/bind16
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)159-177
Antal sider18
ISSN1570-5854
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2015

Emneord

  • throughput legitimacy
  • governance
  • agencification

Citer dette

@article{118286a3e6984d7098ae2c9913dcdeff,
title = "Unpacking the mechanisms of the EU ‘throughput’ governance legitimacy: the case of EFSA",
abstract = "The proliferation of EU agencies, referred to as agencification phenomenon, constitutes a significant EU institutional innovation. Agencification aimed to provide information, promote efficiency, decrease politicization and generate standards based on specialised technical knowledge. However, the expanded role of EU agencies in regulatory policymaking has raised legitimacy questions, particularly in times of crisis and scandals. The legitimacy of agencies has been extensively studied with regard to input, and output (efficiency) legitimacy criteria. Instead, drawing on Schmidt’s (2013) work this article claims that in order to assess the overall legitimacy of the EU regulatory governance through agencies, the ‘throughput’ criterion needs to be considered. Although important, the ‘input’ (politics) and ‘output’ (policy) criteria fail to capture what happens within the actual governance (process), between the decisions and the outcomes. Examples from the EU food regulatory governance through the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), a particularly technical and scientific policy area, illustrate how the ‘throughput’ mechanisms operate. While the absence of one of the throughput mechanisms delegitimizes the regulatory governance of food, their simultaneous presence contributes to overall legitimacy of governance.",
keywords = "throughput legitimacy, governance, agencification",
author = "Sevasti Chatzopoulou",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/23745118.2014.974312",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "159--177",
journal = "European Politics and Society",
issn = "2374-5118",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Unpacking the mechanisms of the EU ‘throughput’ governance legitimacy : the case of EFSA. / Chatzopoulou, Sevasti.

I: Perspectives on European Politics and Society, Bind 16, Nr. 2, 2015, s. 159-177.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpacking the mechanisms of the EU ‘throughput’ governance legitimacy

T2 - the case of EFSA

AU - Chatzopoulou, Sevasti

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The proliferation of EU agencies, referred to as agencification phenomenon, constitutes a significant EU institutional innovation. Agencification aimed to provide information, promote efficiency, decrease politicization and generate standards based on specialised technical knowledge. However, the expanded role of EU agencies in regulatory policymaking has raised legitimacy questions, particularly in times of crisis and scandals. The legitimacy of agencies has been extensively studied with regard to input, and output (efficiency) legitimacy criteria. Instead, drawing on Schmidt’s (2013) work this article claims that in order to assess the overall legitimacy of the EU regulatory governance through agencies, the ‘throughput’ criterion needs to be considered. Although important, the ‘input’ (politics) and ‘output’ (policy) criteria fail to capture what happens within the actual governance (process), between the decisions and the outcomes. Examples from the EU food regulatory governance through the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), a particularly technical and scientific policy area, illustrate how the ‘throughput’ mechanisms operate. While the absence of one of the throughput mechanisms delegitimizes the regulatory governance of food, their simultaneous presence contributes to overall legitimacy of governance.

AB - The proliferation of EU agencies, referred to as agencification phenomenon, constitutes a significant EU institutional innovation. Agencification aimed to provide information, promote efficiency, decrease politicization and generate standards based on specialised technical knowledge. However, the expanded role of EU agencies in regulatory policymaking has raised legitimacy questions, particularly in times of crisis and scandals. The legitimacy of agencies has been extensively studied with regard to input, and output (efficiency) legitimacy criteria. Instead, drawing on Schmidt’s (2013) work this article claims that in order to assess the overall legitimacy of the EU regulatory governance through agencies, the ‘throughput’ criterion needs to be considered. Although important, the ‘input’ (politics) and ‘output’ (policy) criteria fail to capture what happens within the actual governance (process), between the decisions and the outcomes. Examples from the EU food regulatory governance through the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), a particularly technical and scientific policy area, illustrate how the ‘throughput’ mechanisms operate. While the absence of one of the throughput mechanisms delegitimizes the regulatory governance of food, their simultaneous presence contributes to overall legitimacy of governance.

KW - throughput legitimacy

KW - governance

KW - agencification

U2 - 10.1080/23745118.2014.974312

DO - 10.1080/23745118.2014.974312

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 159

EP - 177

JO - European Politics and Society

JF - European Politics and Society

SN - 2374-5118

IS - 2

ER -