Understanding the development of international environmental agreements

A review of selected approaches to the development of international environmental regulation and the development of an integrated heuristic framework

Jens Stærdahl

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskning

Resumé

There are many different theoretical schools concerned with how international regimes develop, and each supplies its own interpretation focusing on one or a few aspects of the process. Such ‘one shot’ explanations may be fruitful for scientific debate, but less useful as conceptual frameworks for practitioners and planners manoeuvring in a complex world. On the basis of a review of selected theories of international and environmental regulation, this article initiates the development of a conceptual framework for understanding the development of internationalenvironmental agreements. The point of departure for developing the model is the actor-structure debate within social science and theory of international relations. Based on critical realism, a framework is developed specifying the relation between collective action problem situations and negotiation situations. It is argued that the main characteristics of the collective action problem situation are story lines, socio-economic characteristics and political institutions. Socio-economic characteristics are defined as the relation of activities and consequences to production and distribution of goods (scope and integration) Storylines are discursive condensations of elements from many different domains into one narrative (Marteen Hajer). Political Institutions are codes of conduct that serve to define social practices, assign roles to the participants, and guide interaction among occupants of these roles (Oran Young). Regarding the negotiation between the involved states, the negotiation situation, it is argued that the starting point for understanding the negotiation situation is the position expressed by the national leader at the negotiation table. The research strategy for understanding the formation of the national negation position depends on the situation.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2006
Antal sider31
StatusUdgivet - 2006
BegivenhedNordic political science conference (NOPSA) XIV - Reykjavik, Island
Varighed: 11 aug. 200513 aug. 2005

Konference

KonferenceNordic political science conference (NOPSA) XIV
LandIsland
ByReykjavik
Periode11/08/200513/08/2005

Bibliografisk note

Sider: 1-31

Citer dette

@conference{6841cea052d011db8236000ea68e967b,
title = "Understanding the development of international environmental agreements: A review of selected approaches to the development of international environmental regulation and the development of an integrated heuristic framework",
abstract = "There are many different theoretical schools concerned with how international regimes develop, and each supplies its own interpretation focusing on one or a few aspects of the process. Such ‘one shot’ explanations may be fruitful for scientific debate, but less useful as conceptual frameworks for practitioners and planners manoeuvring in a complex world. On the basis of a review of selected theories of international and environmental regulation, this article initiates the development of a conceptual framework for understanding the development of internationalenvironmental agreements. The point of departure for developing the model is the actor-structure debate within social science and theory of international relations. Based on critical realism, a framework is developed specifying the relation between collective action problem situations and negotiation situations. It is argued that the main characteristics of the collective action problem situation are story lines, socio-economic characteristics and political institutions. Socio-economic characteristics are defined as the relation of activities and consequences to production and distribution of goods (scope and integration) Storylines are discursive condensations of elements from many different domains into one narrative (Marteen Hajer). Political Institutions are codes of conduct that serve to define social practices, assign roles to the participants, and guide interaction among occupants of these roles (Oran Young). Regarding the negotiation between the involved states, the negotiation situation, it is argued that the starting point for understanding the negotiation situation is the position expressed by the national leader at the negotiation table. The research strategy for understanding the formation of the national negation position depends on the situation.",
keywords = "internatational environmental regimes",
author = "Jens St{\ae}rdahl",
note = "Sider: 1-31; null ; Conference date: 11-08-2005 Through 13-08-2005",
year = "2006",
language = "English",

}

Understanding the development of international environmental agreements : A review of selected approaches to the development of international environmental regulation and the development of an integrated heuristic framework. / Stærdahl, Jens.

2006. Afhandling præsenteret på Nordic political science conference (NOPSA) XIV, Reykjavik, Island.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskning

TY - CONF

T1 - Understanding the development of international environmental agreements

T2 - A review of selected approaches to the development of international environmental regulation and the development of an integrated heuristic framework

AU - Stærdahl, Jens

N1 - Sider: 1-31

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - There are many different theoretical schools concerned with how international regimes develop, and each supplies its own interpretation focusing on one or a few aspects of the process. Such ‘one shot’ explanations may be fruitful for scientific debate, but less useful as conceptual frameworks for practitioners and planners manoeuvring in a complex world. On the basis of a review of selected theories of international and environmental regulation, this article initiates the development of a conceptual framework for understanding the development of internationalenvironmental agreements. The point of departure for developing the model is the actor-structure debate within social science and theory of international relations. Based on critical realism, a framework is developed specifying the relation between collective action problem situations and negotiation situations. It is argued that the main characteristics of the collective action problem situation are story lines, socio-economic characteristics and political institutions. Socio-economic characteristics are defined as the relation of activities and consequences to production and distribution of goods (scope and integration) Storylines are discursive condensations of elements from many different domains into one narrative (Marteen Hajer). Political Institutions are codes of conduct that serve to define social practices, assign roles to the participants, and guide interaction among occupants of these roles (Oran Young). Regarding the negotiation between the involved states, the negotiation situation, it is argued that the starting point for understanding the negotiation situation is the position expressed by the national leader at the negotiation table. The research strategy for understanding the formation of the national negation position depends on the situation.

AB - There are many different theoretical schools concerned with how international regimes develop, and each supplies its own interpretation focusing on one or a few aspects of the process. Such ‘one shot’ explanations may be fruitful for scientific debate, but less useful as conceptual frameworks for practitioners and planners manoeuvring in a complex world. On the basis of a review of selected theories of international and environmental regulation, this article initiates the development of a conceptual framework for understanding the development of internationalenvironmental agreements. The point of departure for developing the model is the actor-structure debate within social science and theory of international relations. Based on critical realism, a framework is developed specifying the relation between collective action problem situations and negotiation situations. It is argued that the main characteristics of the collective action problem situation are story lines, socio-economic characteristics and political institutions. Socio-economic characteristics are defined as the relation of activities and consequences to production and distribution of goods (scope and integration) Storylines are discursive condensations of elements from many different domains into one narrative (Marteen Hajer). Political Institutions are codes of conduct that serve to define social practices, assign roles to the participants, and guide interaction among occupants of these roles (Oran Young). Regarding the negotiation between the involved states, the negotiation situation, it is argued that the starting point for understanding the negotiation situation is the position expressed by the national leader at the negotiation table. The research strategy for understanding the formation of the national negation position depends on the situation.

KW - internatational environmental regimes

M3 - Paper

ER -