Towards better modelling and decision support

Documenting model development, testing, and analysis using TRACE

Mattia Meli, V Grimm, J. Augusiak, A. Focks, B.M. Frank, F. Gabsi, A.S.A. Johnston , C. Liu, B.T. Martin , P. Thorbek, S.F. Railsback

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    The potential of ecological models for supporting environmental decision making is increasingly acknowledged. However, it often remains unclear whether a model is realistic and reliable enough. Good practice for developing and testing ecological models has not yet been established. Therefore, TRACE, a general framework for documenting a model's rationale, design, and testing was recently suggested. Originally TRACE was aimed at documenting good modelling practice. However, the word 'documentation' does not convey TRACE's urgency. Therefore, we re-define TRACE as a tool for planning, performing, and documenting good modelling practice. TRACE documents should provide convincing evidence that a model was thoughtfully designed, correctly implemented, thoroughly tested, well understood, and appropriately used for its intended purpose. TRACE documents link the science underlying a model to its application, thereby also linking modellers and model users, for example stakeholders, decision makers, and developers of policies. We report on first experiences in producing TRACE documents. We found that the original idea underlying TRACE was valid, but to make its use more coherent and efficient, an update of its structure and more specific guidance for its use are needed. The updated TRACE format follows the recently developed framework of model 'evaludation': the entire process of establishing model quality and credibility throughout all stages of model development, analysis, and application. TRACE thus becomes a tool for planning, documenting, and assessing model evaludation, which includes understanding the rationale behind a model and its envisaged use. We introduce the new structure and revised terminology of TRACE and provide examples
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftEcological Modelling
    Vol/bind280
    Sider (fra-til)129-139
    ISSN0304-3800
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2014

    Citer dette

    Meli, Mattia ; Grimm, V ; Augusiak, J. ; Focks, A. ; Frank, B.M. ; Gabsi, F. ; Johnston , A.S.A. ; Liu, C. ; Martin , B.T. ; Thorbek, P. ; Railsback, S.F. / Towards better modelling and decision support : Documenting model development, testing, and analysis using TRACE. I: Ecological Modelling. 2014 ; Bind 280. s. 129-139.
    @article{5775fd24b28a49d5a03d85fbdac73597,
    title = "Towards better modelling and decision support: Documenting model development, testing, and analysis using TRACE",
    abstract = "The potential of ecological models for supporting environmental decision making is increasingly acknowledged. However, it often remains unclear whether a model is realistic and reliable enough. Good practice for developing and testing ecological models has not yet been established. Therefore, TRACE, a general framework for documenting a model's rationale, design, and testing was recently suggested. Originally TRACE was aimed at documenting good modelling practice. However, the word 'documentation' does not convey TRACE's urgency. Therefore, we re-define TRACE as a tool for planning, performing, and documenting good modelling practice. TRACE documents should provide convincing evidence that a model was thoughtfully designed, correctly implemented, thoroughly tested, well understood, and appropriately used for its intended purpose. TRACE documents link the science underlying a model to its application, thereby also linking modellers and model users, for example stakeholders, decision makers, and developers of policies. We report on first experiences in producing TRACE documents. We found that the original idea underlying TRACE was valid, but to make its use more coherent and efficient, an update of its structure and more specific guidance for its use are needed. The updated TRACE format follows the recently developed framework of model 'evaludation': the entire process of establishing model quality and credibility throughout all stages of model development, analysis, and application. TRACE thus becomes a tool for planning, documenting, and assessing model evaludation, which includes understanding the rationale behind a model and its envisaged use. We introduce the new structure and revised terminology of TRACE and provide examples",
    author = "Mattia Meli and V Grimm and J. Augusiak and A. Focks and B.M. Frank and F. Gabsi and A.S.A. Johnston and C. Liu and B.T. Martin and P. Thorbek and S.F. Railsback",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.01.018",
    language = "English",
    volume = "280",
    pages = "129--139",
    journal = "Ecological Modelling",
    issn = "0304-3800",
    publisher = "Elsevier BV",

    }

    Meli, M, Grimm, V, Augusiak, J, Focks, A, Frank, BM, Gabsi, F, Johnston , ASA, Liu, C, Martin , BT, Thorbek, P & Railsback, SF 2014, 'Towards better modelling and decision support: Documenting model development, testing, and analysis using TRACE', Ecological Modelling, bind 280, s. 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.01.018

    Towards better modelling and decision support : Documenting model development, testing, and analysis using TRACE. / Meli, Mattia; Grimm, V; Augusiak, J.; Focks, A.; Frank, B.M.; Gabsi, F.; Johnston , A.S.A.; Liu, C.; Martin , B.T.; Thorbek, P.; Railsback, S.F.

    I: Ecological Modelling, Bind 280, 2014, s. 129-139.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Towards better modelling and decision support

    T2 - Documenting model development, testing, and analysis using TRACE

    AU - Meli, Mattia

    AU - Grimm, V

    AU - Augusiak, J.

    AU - Focks, A.

    AU - Frank, B.M.

    AU - Gabsi, F.

    AU - Johnston , A.S.A.

    AU - Liu, C.

    AU - Martin , B.T.

    AU - Thorbek, P.

    AU - Railsback, S.F.

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - The potential of ecological models for supporting environmental decision making is increasingly acknowledged. However, it often remains unclear whether a model is realistic and reliable enough. Good practice for developing and testing ecological models has not yet been established. Therefore, TRACE, a general framework for documenting a model's rationale, design, and testing was recently suggested. Originally TRACE was aimed at documenting good modelling practice. However, the word 'documentation' does not convey TRACE's urgency. Therefore, we re-define TRACE as a tool for planning, performing, and documenting good modelling practice. TRACE documents should provide convincing evidence that a model was thoughtfully designed, correctly implemented, thoroughly tested, well understood, and appropriately used for its intended purpose. TRACE documents link the science underlying a model to its application, thereby also linking modellers and model users, for example stakeholders, decision makers, and developers of policies. We report on first experiences in producing TRACE documents. We found that the original idea underlying TRACE was valid, but to make its use more coherent and efficient, an update of its structure and more specific guidance for its use are needed. The updated TRACE format follows the recently developed framework of model 'evaludation': the entire process of establishing model quality and credibility throughout all stages of model development, analysis, and application. TRACE thus becomes a tool for planning, documenting, and assessing model evaludation, which includes understanding the rationale behind a model and its envisaged use. We introduce the new structure and revised terminology of TRACE and provide examples

    AB - The potential of ecological models for supporting environmental decision making is increasingly acknowledged. However, it often remains unclear whether a model is realistic and reliable enough. Good practice for developing and testing ecological models has not yet been established. Therefore, TRACE, a general framework for documenting a model's rationale, design, and testing was recently suggested. Originally TRACE was aimed at documenting good modelling practice. However, the word 'documentation' does not convey TRACE's urgency. Therefore, we re-define TRACE as a tool for planning, performing, and documenting good modelling practice. TRACE documents should provide convincing evidence that a model was thoughtfully designed, correctly implemented, thoroughly tested, well understood, and appropriately used for its intended purpose. TRACE documents link the science underlying a model to its application, thereby also linking modellers and model users, for example stakeholders, decision makers, and developers of policies. We report on first experiences in producing TRACE documents. We found that the original idea underlying TRACE was valid, but to make its use more coherent and efficient, an update of its structure and more specific guidance for its use are needed. The updated TRACE format follows the recently developed framework of model 'evaludation': the entire process of establishing model quality and credibility throughout all stages of model development, analysis, and application. TRACE thus becomes a tool for planning, documenting, and assessing model evaludation, which includes understanding the rationale behind a model and its envisaged use. We introduce the new structure and revised terminology of TRACE and provide examples

    U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.01.018

    DO - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.01.018

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 280

    SP - 129

    EP - 139

    JO - Ecological Modelling

    JF - Ecological Modelling

    SN - 0304-3800

    ER -