“Together We Rise”

Collaboration and Contestation as Narrative Drivers of the Women’s March

Sine Nørholm Just, Sara Louise Muhr

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

The Women’s March is arguably the most important counter-narrative to Trump’s post-truth regime, but does it also present a leadership alternative to his populist and authoritarian style? And is this alternative necessarily better than currently dominant social formations? In this paper, we argue that the Women’s March is partially configured by similar forces of affective circulation as those governing pro-Trump narratives, but that it is different and better in one important respect. The narratives of the Women's March are driven by both collaboration and contestation, meaning its circulation is both centripetal and centrifugal. We substantiate this claim through a close reading of the narration of the Women’s March – from its inception until its first anniversary. Here, we focus particularly on the development from a moment of resistance to a political movement, arguing that this process offers a prototype for conceptualizing a new form of “rebel” or social movement leadership. Hence, the Women’s March not only offers a different and better alternative to the leadership of Trump but also an opportunity for promoting and refining leadership theory in the post-heroic vein.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftLeadership
Vol/bind15
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)245-267
ISSN1742-7150
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019

Citer dette

@article{f7598f8c330f45b7acc67c1e9c6f56ff,
title = "“Together We Rise”: Collaboration and Contestation as Narrative Drivers of the Women’s March",
abstract = "The Women’s March is arguably the most important counter-narrative to Trump’s post-truth regime, but does it also present a leadership alternative to his populist and authoritarian style? And is this alternative necessarily better than currently dominant social formations? In this paper, we argue that the Women’s March is partially configured by similar forces of affective circulation as those governing pro-Trump narratives, but that it is different and better in one important respect. The narratives of the Women's March are driven by both collaboration and contestation, meaning its circulation is both centripetal and centrifugal. We substantiate this claim through a close reading of the narration of the Women’s March – from its inception until its first anniversary. Here, we focus particularly on the development from a moment of resistance to a political movement, arguing that this process offers a prototype for conceptualizing a new form of “rebel” or social movement leadership. Hence, the Women’s March not only offers a different and better alternative to the leadership of Trump but also an opportunity for promoting and refining leadership theory in the post-heroic vein.",
keywords = "collective leadership, intersectional feminism, post-heroic leadership, social movements, the Women's March",
author = "Just, {Sine N{\o}rholm} and Muhr, {Sara Louise}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/1742715018809497",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "245--267",
journal = "Leadership",
issn = "1742-7150",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

“Together We Rise” : Collaboration and Contestation as Narrative Drivers of the Women’s March. / Just, Sine Nørholm; Muhr, Sara Louise.

I: Leadership, Bind 15, Nr. 2, 2019, s. 245-267.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Together We Rise”

T2 - Collaboration and Contestation as Narrative Drivers of the Women’s March

AU - Just, Sine Nørholm

AU - Muhr, Sara Louise

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The Women’s March is arguably the most important counter-narrative to Trump’s post-truth regime, but does it also present a leadership alternative to his populist and authoritarian style? And is this alternative necessarily better than currently dominant social formations? In this paper, we argue that the Women’s March is partially configured by similar forces of affective circulation as those governing pro-Trump narratives, but that it is different and better in one important respect. The narratives of the Women's March are driven by both collaboration and contestation, meaning its circulation is both centripetal and centrifugal. We substantiate this claim through a close reading of the narration of the Women’s March – from its inception until its first anniversary. Here, we focus particularly on the development from a moment of resistance to a political movement, arguing that this process offers a prototype for conceptualizing a new form of “rebel” or social movement leadership. Hence, the Women’s March not only offers a different and better alternative to the leadership of Trump but also an opportunity for promoting and refining leadership theory in the post-heroic vein.

AB - The Women’s March is arguably the most important counter-narrative to Trump’s post-truth regime, but does it also present a leadership alternative to his populist and authoritarian style? And is this alternative necessarily better than currently dominant social formations? In this paper, we argue that the Women’s March is partially configured by similar forces of affective circulation as those governing pro-Trump narratives, but that it is different and better in one important respect. The narratives of the Women's March are driven by both collaboration and contestation, meaning its circulation is both centripetal and centrifugal. We substantiate this claim through a close reading of the narration of the Women’s March – from its inception until its first anniversary. Here, we focus particularly on the development from a moment of resistance to a political movement, arguing that this process offers a prototype for conceptualizing a new form of “rebel” or social movement leadership. Hence, the Women’s March not only offers a different and better alternative to the leadership of Trump but also an opportunity for promoting and refining leadership theory in the post-heroic vein.

KW - collective leadership

KW - intersectional feminism

KW - post-heroic leadership

KW - social movements

KW - the Women's March

U2 - 10.1177/1742715018809497

DO - 10.1177/1742715018809497

M3 - Journal article

VL - 15

SP - 245

EP - 267

JO - Leadership

JF - Leadership

SN - 1742-7150

IS - 2

ER -