Thinking Through the Screen: A postphenomenological Investigation into Digital Drawing in Architecture Education

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Architectural thinking is formed through the act of drawing, and the architectural drawing is not a neutral representation. Critics such as the Finish architect Juhani Pallasmaa denounce digital drawing for its inherent haptic remoteness and remind us of the importance of embodiment in the creative process of drawing. Yet, architecture students today very commonly draw using digital tools. This article examines digital drawing using a postphenomenological framework. Students’ drawing practices are analysed in terms of the various technologically mediated relations as put forward by Don Ihde. Furthermore, I introduce the distinction between ‘empirical’ and ‘ideational’ visualisation to discern between imagined and empirically experienced elements of architectural drawing. This opens the possibility to counter critics such as Pallasmaa and bring the creative potential of digital drawing to the fore.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftKunstlicht
Vol/bind38
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)80-87
ISSN0921-5026
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Citer dette

@article{a353f5bffb3e4967bd340d07a4fffa38,
title = "Thinking Through the Screen: A postphenomenological Investigation into Digital Drawing in Architecture Education",
abstract = "Architectural thinking is formed through the act of drawing, and the architectural drawing is not a neutral representation. Critics such as the Finish architect Juhani Pallasmaa denounce digital drawing for its inherent haptic remoteness and remind us of the importance of embodiment in the creative process of drawing. Yet, architecture students today very commonly draw using digital tools. This article examines digital drawing using a postphenomenological framework. Students’ drawing practices are analysed in terms of the various technologically mediated relations as put forward by Don Ihde. Furthermore, I introduce the distinction between ‘empirical’ and ‘ideational’ visualisation to discern between imagined and empirically experienced elements of architectural drawing. This opens the possibility to counter critics such as Pallasmaa and bring the creative potential of digital drawing to the fore.",
author = "Hyams, {Inger Louise Berling}",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "80--87",
journal = "Kunstlicht",
issn = "0921-5026",
number = "4",

}

Thinking Through the Screen : A postphenomenological Investigation into Digital Drawing in Architecture Education. / Hyams, Inger Louise Berling.

I: Kunstlicht, Bind 38, Nr. 4, 2017, s. 80-87.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thinking Through the Screen

T2 - A postphenomenological Investigation into Digital Drawing in Architecture Education

AU - Hyams, Inger Louise Berling

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Architectural thinking is formed through the act of drawing, and the architectural drawing is not a neutral representation. Critics such as the Finish architect Juhani Pallasmaa denounce digital drawing for its inherent haptic remoteness and remind us of the importance of embodiment in the creative process of drawing. Yet, architecture students today very commonly draw using digital tools. This article examines digital drawing using a postphenomenological framework. Students’ drawing practices are analysed in terms of the various technologically mediated relations as put forward by Don Ihde. Furthermore, I introduce the distinction between ‘empirical’ and ‘ideational’ visualisation to discern between imagined and empirically experienced elements of architectural drawing. This opens the possibility to counter critics such as Pallasmaa and bring the creative potential of digital drawing to the fore.

AB - Architectural thinking is formed through the act of drawing, and the architectural drawing is not a neutral representation. Critics such as the Finish architect Juhani Pallasmaa denounce digital drawing for its inherent haptic remoteness and remind us of the importance of embodiment in the creative process of drawing. Yet, architecture students today very commonly draw using digital tools. This article examines digital drawing using a postphenomenological framework. Students’ drawing practices are analysed in terms of the various technologically mediated relations as put forward by Don Ihde. Furthermore, I introduce the distinction between ‘empirical’ and ‘ideational’ visualisation to discern between imagined and empirically experienced elements of architectural drawing. This opens the possibility to counter critics such as Pallasmaa and bring the creative potential of digital drawing to the fore.

UR - https://tijdschriftkunstlicht.nl/vol-38-2017-no-4-mediated-imaginations-technologies-touching-upon-art/

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 80

EP - 87

JO - Kunstlicht

JF - Kunstlicht

SN - 0921-5026

IS - 4

ER -