The Rise of the Welfare State in International Society

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In this article I seek to develop a case for viewing the welfare state as a primary institution in international society. This is with particular reference to Norden (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden), where in the course of the 1930s, and particularly in the post-1945 era, the welfare state was elevated to a core principle of legitimacy, largely defining the idea of nationhood for these countries. Furthermore, I will attempt to show how the adoption of this principle of legitimacy conditioned the Nordic countries’ interpretation of a number of other primary institutions in international society such as diplomacy, war and trade. A key contribution of this approach is that it aspires not only to examine the evolution of one institution in isolation, as has often been attempted in English School scholarship, but to actively explore how institutions interact with each other.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCambridge Review of International Affairs
Vol/bind28
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)599-620
Antal sider21
ISSN0955-7571
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 14 dec. 2015

Citer dette

@article{fad1a756961041c8b960ec1e4d1157e7,
title = "The Rise of the Welfare State in International Society",
abstract = "In this article I seek to develop a case for viewing the welfare state as a primary institution in international society. This is with particular reference to Norden (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden), where in the course of the 1930s, and particularly in the post-1945 era, the welfare state was elevated to a core principle of legitimacy, largely defining the idea of nationhood for these countries. Furthermore, I will attempt to show how the adoption of this principle of legitimacy conditioned the Nordic countries’ interpretation of a number of other primary institutions in international society such as diplomacy, war and trade. A key contribution of this approach is that it aspires not only to examine the evolution of one institution in isolation, as has often been attempted in English School scholarship, but to actively explore how institutions interact with each other.",
author = "Laust Schouenborg",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1080/09557571.2012.678291",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "599--620",
journal = "Cambridge Review of International Affairs",
issn = "0955-7571",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

The Rise of the Welfare State in International Society. / Schouenborg, Laust.

I: Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Bind 28, Nr. 4, 14.12.2015, s. 599-620.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Rise of the Welfare State in International Society

AU - Schouenborg, Laust

PY - 2015/12/14

Y1 - 2015/12/14

N2 - In this article I seek to develop a case for viewing the welfare state as a primary institution in international society. This is with particular reference to Norden (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden), where in the course of the 1930s, and particularly in the post-1945 era, the welfare state was elevated to a core principle of legitimacy, largely defining the idea of nationhood for these countries. Furthermore, I will attempt to show how the adoption of this principle of legitimacy conditioned the Nordic countries’ interpretation of a number of other primary institutions in international society such as diplomacy, war and trade. A key contribution of this approach is that it aspires not only to examine the evolution of one institution in isolation, as has often been attempted in English School scholarship, but to actively explore how institutions interact with each other.

AB - In this article I seek to develop a case for viewing the welfare state as a primary institution in international society. This is with particular reference to Norden (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden), where in the course of the 1930s, and particularly in the post-1945 era, the welfare state was elevated to a core principle of legitimacy, largely defining the idea of nationhood for these countries. Furthermore, I will attempt to show how the adoption of this principle of legitimacy conditioned the Nordic countries’ interpretation of a number of other primary institutions in international society such as diplomacy, war and trade. A key contribution of this approach is that it aspires not only to examine the evolution of one institution in isolation, as has often been attempted in English School scholarship, but to actively explore how institutions interact with each other.

U2 - 10.1080/09557571.2012.678291

DO - 10.1080/09557571.2012.678291

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 599

EP - 620

JO - Cambridge Review of International Affairs

JF - Cambridge Review of International Affairs

SN - 0955-7571

IS - 4

ER -