The Rhetorical Illusions of News

Chris Peters, Marcel Broersma

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

Resumé

Imagine for a moment – a thought experiment if you will – that journalism as we have come to know it would disappear overnight. What would happen in terms of the informational flows in society? What would we miss and what would be the risk, if any? Instinctively, the answers likely proffered to such a hypothetical scenario are predictable: people would lose crucial information for engaging civically; unfettered from investigative oversight, governments, businesses and other powerful institutions would become less accountable; the fodder for public discussion on prominent issues of the day would be lost; and so on and so forth. In sum: the conditioned reaction on questions about ‘what journalism is good for’ tends to lead back toward familiar rhetorics and rationales.

Journalism’s normative claims rely heavily upon these established modernist discourses which serve to affirm its essential role within a democracy and assert its relevance to the public (see McNair, 2012; Schudson, 2008). However, the reality is that most journalism is not a public good, at least not in the traditional economic sense. Publishers in print and online as well as commercial broadcasters are typically companies with all the drawbacks and market susceptibilities this implies no matter how much journalists, journalism studies scholars, and audiences alike frequently place expectations of public service upon journalism tout court. Even public broadcasting, for that matter, is obliged by law to cater for and reach certain audiences. Given this context, it is intriguing to consider the possible disconnect between journalism’s normative assertions, its day-to-day activities, and its actual resonance.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelRethinking Journalism Again : Societal role and public relevance in a digital age
RedaktørerChris Peters, Marcel Broersma
Udgivelses stedLondon
ForlagRoutledge
Publikationsdato2017
Sider188-204
Kapitel12
ISBN (Trykt)9781138860865
ISBN (Elektronisk)9781317506416
StatusUdgivet - 2017
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citer dette

Peters, C., & Broersma, M. (2017). The Rhetorical Illusions of News. I C. Peters, & M. Broersma (red.), Rethinking Journalism Again: Societal role and public relevance in a digital age (s. 188-204). London: Routledge.
Peters, Chris ; Broersma, Marcel. / The Rhetorical Illusions of News. Rethinking Journalism Again: Societal role and public relevance in a digital age. red. / Chris Peters ; Marcel Broersma. London : Routledge, 2017. s. 188-204
@inbook{e10a7435ee4c4b099ebb1c994346588d,
title = "The Rhetorical Illusions of News",
abstract = "Imagine for a moment – a thought experiment if you will – that journalism as we have come to know it would disappear overnight. What would happen in terms of the informational flows in society? What would we miss and what would be the risk, if any? Instinctively, the answers likely proffered to such a hypothetical scenario are predictable: people would lose crucial information for engaging civically; unfettered from investigative oversight, governments, businesses and other powerful institutions would become less accountable; the fodder for public discussion on prominent issues of the day would be lost; and so on and so forth. In sum: the conditioned reaction on questions about ‘what journalism is good for’ tends to lead back toward familiar rhetorics and rationales. Journalism’s normative claims rely heavily upon these established modernist discourses which serve to affirm its essential role within a democracy and assert its relevance to the public (see McNair, 2012; Schudson, 2008). However, the reality is that most journalism is not a public good, at least not in the traditional economic sense. Publishers in print and online as well as commercial broadcasters are typically companies with all the drawbacks and market susceptibilities this implies no matter how much journalists, journalism studies scholars, and audiences alike frequently place expectations of public service upon journalism tout court. Even public broadcasting, for that matter, is obliged by law to cater for and reach certain audiences. Given this context, it is intriguing to consider the possible disconnect between journalism’s normative assertions, its day-to-day activities, and its actual resonance.",
author = "Chris Peters and Marcel Broersma",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138860865",
pages = "188--204",
editor = "Chris Peters and Marcel Broersma",
booktitle = "Rethinking Journalism Again",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Peters, C & Broersma, M 2017, The Rhetorical Illusions of News. i C Peters & M Broersma (red), Rethinking Journalism Again: Societal role and public relevance in a digital age. Routledge, London, s. 188-204.

The Rhetorical Illusions of News. / Peters, Chris; Broersma, Marcel.

Rethinking Journalism Again: Societal role and public relevance in a digital age. red. / Chris Peters; Marcel Broersma. London : Routledge, 2017. s. 188-204.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Rhetorical Illusions of News

AU - Peters, Chris

AU - Broersma, Marcel

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Imagine for a moment – a thought experiment if you will – that journalism as we have come to know it would disappear overnight. What would happen in terms of the informational flows in society? What would we miss and what would be the risk, if any? Instinctively, the answers likely proffered to such a hypothetical scenario are predictable: people would lose crucial information for engaging civically; unfettered from investigative oversight, governments, businesses and other powerful institutions would become less accountable; the fodder for public discussion on prominent issues of the day would be lost; and so on and so forth. In sum: the conditioned reaction on questions about ‘what journalism is good for’ tends to lead back toward familiar rhetorics and rationales. Journalism’s normative claims rely heavily upon these established modernist discourses which serve to affirm its essential role within a democracy and assert its relevance to the public (see McNair, 2012; Schudson, 2008). However, the reality is that most journalism is not a public good, at least not in the traditional economic sense. Publishers in print and online as well as commercial broadcasters are typically companies with all the drawbacks and market susceptibilities this implies no matter how much journalists, journalism studies scholars, and audiences alike frequently place expectations of public service upon journalism tout court. Even public broadcasting, for that matter, is obliged by law to cater for and reach certain audiences. Given this context, it is intriguing to consider the possible disconnect between journalism’s normative assertions, its day-to-day activities, and its actual resonance.

AB - Imagine for a moment – a thought experiment if you will – that journalism as we have come to know it would disappear overnight. What would happen in terms of the informational flows in society? What would we miss and what would be the risk, if any? Instinctively, the answers likely proffered to such a hypothetical scenario are predictable: people would lose crucial information for engaging civically; unfettered from investigative oversight, governments, businesses and other powerful institutions would become less accountable; the fodder for public discussion on prominent issues of the day would be lost; and so on and so forth. In sum: the conditioned reaction on questions about ‘what journalism is good for’ tends to lead back toward familiar rhetorics and rationales. Journalism’s normative claims rely heavily upon these established modernist discourses which serve to affirm its essential role within a democracy and assert its relevance to the public (see McNair, 2012; Schudson, 2008). However, the reality is that most journalism is not a public good, at least not in the traditional economic sense. Publishers in print and online as well as commercial broadcasters are typically companies with all the drawbacks and market susceptibilities this implies no matter how much journalists, journalism studies scholars, and audiences alike frequently place expectations of public service upon journalism tout court. Even public broadcasting, for that matter, is obliged by law to cater for and reach certain audiences. Given this context, it is intriguing to consider the possible disconnect between journalism’s normative assertions, its day-to-day activities, and its actual resonance.

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9781138860865

SP - 188

EP - 204

BT - Rethinking Journalism Again

A2 - Peters, Chris

A2 - Broersma, Marcel

PB - Routledge

CY - London

ER -

Peters C, Broersma M. The Rhetorical Illusions of News. I Peters C, Broersma M, red., Rethinking Journalism Again: Societal role and public relevance in a digital age. London: Routledge. 2017. s. 188-204