The "public eye" or "disaster tourists": Investigating public perceptions of citizen smartphone imagery

Stuart Allan, Chris Peters

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article contributes to debates regarding professional–amateur interfaces in photojournalism by reporting on findings from a qualitative study with members of a demographic cohort often described as “millennial” users (that is, people born between 1980 and 1999). A textual analysis of their responses identified five thematics for analysis: (1) respondents’ views regarding the prospective role of bearing witness and what it may entail; (2) the motivations of those engaged in this type of activity; (3) the uses of citizen smartphone imagery by news organisations; (4) presumed distinctions between professional and amateur or citizen photojournalism; and (5) ethical questions of trust where the ensuing imagery was concerned. On this evidential basis, professional photojournalism’s discursive authority is shown to be open to challenge by the alternative ethos of citizen imagery, with respondents’ perceptions raising questions over realness, authenticity and truth-value complicating, and at times destabilising, familiar professional–amateur normative binarisms.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDigital Journalism
Vol/bind3
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)477-494
ISSN2167-0811
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2015
Udgivet eksterntJa

Emneord

  • photojournalism
  • citizen journalism
  • Young Adult
  • smartphones
  • witnessing
  • civic engagement
  • audiences
  • ethics

Citer dette

@article{b25aeec513454f04ad6f73e936eafbca,
title = "The {"}public eye{"} or {"}disaster tourists{"}: Investigating public perceptions of citizen smartphone imagery",
abstract = "This article contributes to debates regarding professional–amateur interfaces in photojournalism by reporting on findings from a qualitative study with members of a demographic cohort often described as “millennial” users (that is, people born between 1980 and 1999). A textual analysis of their responses identified five thematics for analysis: (1) respondents’ views regarding the prospective role of bearing witness and what it may entail; (2) the motivations of those engaged in this type of activity; (3) the uses of citizen smartphone imagery by news organisations; (4) presumed distinctions between professional and amateur or citizen photojournalism; and (5) ethical questions of trust where the ensuing imagery was concerned. On this evidential basis, professional photojournalism’s discursive authority is shown to be open to challenge by the alternative ethos of citizen imagery, with respondents’ perceptions raising questions over realness, authenticity and truth-value complicating, and at times destabilising, familiar professional–amateur normative binarisms.",
keywords = "photojournalism, citizen journalism, Young Adult, smartphones, witnessing, civic engagement, audiences, ethics",
author = "Stuart Allan and Chris Peters",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/21670811.2015.1034517",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "477--494",
journal = "Digital Journalism",
issn = "2167-0811",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

The "public eye" or "disaster tourists" : Investigating public perceptions of citizen smartphone imagery. / Allan, Stuart; Peters, Chris.

I: Digital Journalism, Bind 3, Nr. 4, 2015, s. 477-494.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The "public eye" or "disaster tourists"

T2 - Investigating public perceptions of citizen smartphone imagery

AU - Allan, Stuart

AU - Peters, Chris

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This article contributes to debates regarding professional–amateur interfaces in photojournalism by reporting on findings from a qualitative study with members of a demographic cohort often described as “millennial” users (that is, people born between 1980 and 1999). A textual analysis of their responses identified five thematics for analysis: (1) respondents’ views regarding the prospective role of bearing witness and what it may entail; (2) the motivations of those engaged in this type of activity; (3) the uses of citizen smartphone imagery by news organisations; (4) presumed distinctions between professional and amateur or citizen photojournalism; and (5) ethical questions of trust where the ensuing imagery was concerned. On this evidential basis, professional photojournalism’s discursive authority is shown to be open to challenge by the alternative ethos of citizen imagery, with respondents’ perceptions raising questions over realness, authenticity and truth-value complicating, and at times destabilising, familiar professional–amateur normative binarisms.

AB - This article contributes to debates regarding professional–amateur interfaces in photojournalism by reporting on findings from a qualitative study with members of a demographic cohort often described as “millennial” users (that is, people born between 1980 and 1999). A textual analysis of their responses identified five thematics for analysis: (1) respondents’ views regarding the prospective role of bearing witness and what it may entail; (2) the motivations of those engaged in this type of activity; (3) the uses of citizen smartphone imagery by news organisations; (4) presumed distinctions between professional and amateur or citizen photojournalism; and (5) ethical questions of trust where the ensuing imagery was concerned. On this evidential basis, professional photojournalism’s discursive authority is shown to be open to challenge by the alternative ethos of citizen imagery, with respondents’ perceptions raising questions over realness, authenticity and truth-value complicating, and at times destabilising, familiar professional–amateur normative binarisms.

KW - photojournalism

KW - citizen journalism

KW - Young Adult

KW - smartphones

KW - witnessing

KW - civic engagement

KW - audiences

KW - ethics

U2 - 10.1080/21670811.2015.1034517

DO - 10.1080/21670811.2015.1034517

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 477

EP - 494

JO - Digital Journalism

JF - Digital Journalism

SN - 2167-0811

IS - 4

ER -