The Precarious State of Famine Research

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In 2017 famine struck yet again. While famine continues to haunt many fragile countries, the paper reveals a faltering scholarly interest in famine research, particularly within the research tradition of development studies. Today, the research field is rather dominated by the research traditions of history and economics. Interestingly, the steepest decline in scholarly attention to famine coincided with Amartya Sen being awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1998 in part for his work on famine. The paper points to three characteristics of famine research that might account for this rather puzzling development: (i) the field of contemporary famine research exhibits limited interest in theory-building; (ii) the field is impeded by inaccessibility to key research sites; and (iii) the field is weakened by a small and dispersed research community. The paper suggests remedies that might address these obstacles to contemporary famine research in development studies. To facilitate more theoretical development, scholars could engage with the recent call for a criminalisation of famine, and the broader field of disaster research could be used as an institutional catalyst for scholars of famine.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer55(8)
TidsskriftJournal of Development Studies
Vol/bind55
Udgave nummer8
Sider (fra-til)1633
Antal sider1.653
ISSN0022-0388
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 16 jul. 2018

Bibliografisk note

Important note from the Publisher regarding the attached version of the article: “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Development Studies on 16 Jul 2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00220388.2018.1493196.”

Citer dette

@article{cc29c8c0bdc64b87bd3f9f7f6d7926bf,
title = "The Precarious State of Famine Research",
abstract = "In 2017 famine struck yet again. While famine continues to haunt many fragile countries, the paper reveals a faltering scholarly interest in famine research, particularly within the research tradition of development studies. Today, the research field is rather dominated by the research traditions of history and economics. Interestingly, the steepest decline in scholarly attention to famine coincided with Amartya Sen being awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1998 in part for his work on famine. The paper points to three characteristics of famine research that might account for this rather puzzling development: (i) the field of contemporary famine research exhibits limited interest in theory-building; (ii) the field is impeded by inaccessibility to key research sites; and (iii) the field is weakened by a small and dispersed research community. The paper suggests remedies that might address these obstacles to contemporary famine research in development studies. To facilitate more theoretical development, scholars could engage with the recent call for a criminalisation of famine, and the broader field of disaster research could be used as an institutional catalyst for scholars of famine.",
author = "Olivier Rubin",
note = "Important note from the Publisher regarding the attached version of the article: “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Development Studies on 16 Jul 2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00220388.2018.1493196.”",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1080/00220388.2018.1493196",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "1633",
journal = "Journal of Development Studies",
issn = "0022-0388",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",
number = "8",

}

The Precarious State of Famine Research. / Rubin, Olivier.

I: Journal of Development Studies, Bind 55, Nr. 8, 55(8), 16.07.2018, s. 1633.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Precarious State of Famine Research

AU - Rubin, Olivier

N1 - Important note from the Publisher regarding the attached version of the article: “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Development Studies on 16 Jul 2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00220388.2018.1493196.”

PY - 2018/7/16

Y1 - 2018/7/16

N2 - In 2017 famine struck yet again. While famine continues to haunt many fragile countries, the paper reveals a faltering scholarly interest in famine research, particularly within the research tradition of development studies. Today, the research field is rather dominated by the research traditions of history and economics. Interestingly, the steepest decline in scholarly attention to famine coincided with Amartya Sen being awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1998 in part for his work on famine. The paper points to three characteristics of famine research that might account for this rather puzzling development: (i) the field of contemporary famine research exhibits limited interest in theory-building; (ii) the field is impeded by inaccessibility to key research sites; and (iii) the field is weakened by a small and dispersed research community. The paper suggests remedies that might address these obstacles to contemporary famine research in development studies. To facilitate more theoretical development, scholars could engage with the recent call for a criminalisation of famine, and the broader field of disaster research could be used as an institutional catalyst for scholars of famine.

AB - In 2017 famine struck yet again. While famine continues to haunt many fragile countries, the paper reveals a faltering scholarly interest in famine research, particularly within the research tradition of development studies. Today, the research field is rather dominated by the research traditions of history and economics. Interestingly, the steepest decline in scholarly attention to famine coincided with Amartya Sen being awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1998 in part for his work on famine. The paper points to three characteristics of famine research that might account for this rather puzzling development: (i) the field of contemporary famine research exhibits limited interest in theory-building; (ii) the field is impeded by inaccessibility to key research sites; and (iii) the field is weakened by a small and dispersed research community. The paper suggests remedies that might address these obstacles to contemporary famine research in development studies. To facilitate more theoretical development, scholars could engage with the recent call for a criminalisation of famine, and the broader field of disaster research could be used as an institutional catalyst for scholars of famine.

U2 - 10.1080/00220388.2018.1493196

DO - 10.1080/00220388.2018.1493196

M3 - Journal article

VL - 55

SP - 1633

JO - Journal of Development Studies

JF - Journal of Development Studies

SN - 0022-0388

IS - 8

M1 - 55(8)

ER -