The Politics of Neutrality and the Changing Role of Expertise in Public Administration

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article explores and discusses the ongoing attempt to reinstate an ethos of neutrality in public administration. It focuses on the political benefits and costs of contemporary strategies in public administration for using expertise based on an ethos of neutrality. On the one hand, expertise may serve to allow a particular form of value neutrality that curbs abuse of political office, questions received wisdom on the efficacy of policy interventions, and thereby holds the potential to minimize the waste of public resources employed to meet political goals. On the other hand, the use of expertise as a mode of supporting neutrality is also problematic inasmuch as it may serve to endorse a politics of necessity and, unwittingly, reduce the scope of political agency.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAdministrative Theory & Praxis
Vol/bind37
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)174-187
ISSN1084-1806
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2015

Citer dette

@article{940b074710f947e7a3fdf679ed98df50,
title = "The Politics of Neutrality and the Changing Role of Expertise in Public Administration",
abstract = "This article explores and discusses the ongoing attempt to reinstate an ethos of neutrality in public administration. It focuses on the political benefits and costs of contemporary strategies in public administration for using expertise based on an ethos of neutrality. On the one hand, expertise may serve to allow a particular form of value neutrality that curbs abuse of political office, questions received wisdom on the efficacy of policy interventions, and thereby holds the potential to minimize the waste of public resources employed to meet political goals. On the other hand, the use of expertise as a mode of supporting neutrality is also problematic inasmuch as it may serve to endorse a politics of necessity and, unwittingly, reduce the scope of political agency.",
author = "Peter Triantafillou",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/10841806.2015.1053362",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "174--187",
journal = "Administrative Theory & Praxis",
issn = "1084-1806",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

The Politics of Neutrality and the Changing Role of Expertise in Public Administration. / Triantafillou, Peter.

I: Administrative Theory & Praxis, Bind 37, Nr. 3, 2015, s. 174-187.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Politics of Neutrality and the Changing Role of Expertise in Public Administration

AU - Triantafillou, Peter

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This article explores and discusses the ongoing attempt to reinstate an ethos of neutrality in public administration. It focuses on the political benefits and costs of contemporary strategies in public administration for using expertise based on an ethos of neutrality. On the one hand, expertise may serve to allow a particular form of value neutrality that curbs abuse of political office, questions received wisdom on the efficacy of policy interventions, and thereby holds the potential to minimize the waste of public resources employed to meet political goals. On the other hand, the use of expertise as a mode of supporting neutrality is also problematic inasmuch as it may serve to endorse a politics of necessity and, unwittingly, reduce the scope of political agency.

AB - This article explores and discusses the ongoing attempt to reinstate an ethos of neutrality in public administration. It focuses on the political benefits and costs of contemporary strategies in public administration for using expertise based on an ethos of neutrality. On the one hand, expertise may serve to allow a particular form of value neutrality that curbs abuse of political office, questions received wisdom on the efficacy of policy interventions, and thereby holds the potential to minimize the waste of public resources employed to meet political goals. On the other hand, the use of expertise as a mode of supporting neutrality is also problematic inasmuch as it may serve to endorse a politics of necessity and, unwittingly, reduce the scope of political agency.

U2 - 10.1080/10841806.2015.1053362

DO - 10.1080/10841806.2015.1053362

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 174

EP - 187

JO - Administrative Theory & Praxis

JF - Administrative Theory & Praxis

SN - 1084-1806

IS - 3

ER -